Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. Core Scientific, Inc. — Entry #126: USCA ORDER ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC (mdj) (Entered: 08/14/2026)
Case: Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. Core Scientific, Inc. txed · 2:25-cv-00519
filed May 12, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #126 · filed August 14, 2026
USCA ORDER ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC (mdj) (Entered: 08/14/2026)
Who is involved
- Core Scientific, Inc. [tracked: Core Scientific]
- CoreWeave, Inc. [tracked: CoreWeave]
- Key Patent Innovations Ltd.
- Malikie Innovations Ltd.
Why we have it
We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Core Scientific (listed as “Core Scientific, Inc.”); CoreWeave (listed as “CoreWeave, Inc.”). We checked the full party list on September 02, 2026 and confirmed the match.
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 03, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 2,677 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case: 26-140
Case 2:25-cv-00519-JRG-RSP Document:
Document25126Page: 1 08/14/26
Filed Filed: 08/13/2026
Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
3825
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE CORE SCIENTIFIC, INC.,
Petitioner
______________________
2026-140
______________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:25-
cv-00519-JRG-RSP, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.
______________________
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND
REHEARING EN BANC
______________________
Before MOORE, Chief Judge, MAYER 1, LOURIE, DYK, PROST,
REYNA, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, STOLL, CUNNINGHAM,
and STARK, Circuit Judges. 2
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Core Scientific, Inc. filed a combined petition for panel
rehearing and rehearing en banc. The petition was referred
to the panel that issued the order, and thereafter the
1 Circuit Judge Mayer participated only in the deci-
sion on the petition for panel rehearing.
2 Circuit Judge Newman did not participate.
Case: 26-140
Case 2:25-cv-00519-JRG-RSP Document:
Document25126Page: 2 08/14/26
Filed Filed: 08/13/2026
Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
3826
2 IN RE CORE SCIENTIFIC, INC.
petition was referred to the circuit judges who are in regu-
lar active service.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
FOR THE COURT
August 13, 2026
Date