Lunstrum v. Centene Corporation — Entry #45: STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties, subject to the Court's approval, as follows: 1
Case: Lunstrum v. Centene Corporation nysd · 1:25-cv-05659
filed July 09, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #45 · filed September 01, 2026
STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties, subject to the Court's approval, as follows: 1. Lead Plaintiff's amended complaint is due on or before November 3, 2026. 2. Pursuant to Rule 2 of the Court's Individual Practices, Defendants will file a letter requesting a pre-motion conference in connection with their anticipated motion to dismiss the amended complaint on or before January 15, 2027. 3. Pursuant to Rule 2 of the Court's Individual Practices, Lead Plaintiff will file a response to Defendants' pre-motion conference letter on or before January 20, 2027. 4. Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint will be due 5 days from the date of the pre-motion conference or the date of the Court's order declining to hold a pre-motion conference; Lead Plaintiff's opposition will be due 77 days after Defendants' motion to dismiss is filed; and Defendants' reply will be due 40 days after Lead Plaintiff's opposition is filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/1/2026) ( Amended Pleadings due by 11/3/2026.) (ar) (Entered: 09/01/2026)
Who is involved
- Andrew Lynn Asher
- Brock Lunstrum
- Centene Corporation
- Ketan Gandhi
- Michael Lehiani
- Mohammad Ali Ahmadi
- Sarah M. London
- Trevor Nielson
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its former name “FLIGHT SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES INC” appears in a filing in this case.
…Co-Lead Counsel. $1.2 million. Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., (D. Conn.). Rosen Lead Counsel. $1…
- Core Scientific: its name “Core Scientific, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Rosen Lead Counsel. Pang v. Levitt (Core Scientific, Inc.), No. 22-CV-1191-LY (W.D. Tex.). Rosen…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 19, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 5,214 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:25-cv-05659-ALC Document 45 Filed 09/01/26 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MICHAEL LEHIANI, Individually, and on Behalf ) Case No. 1:25-cv-05659
of All Others Similarly Situated, )
Plaintiff, )
) STIPULATION AND
v. ) ORDER
)
CENTENE CORPORATION, SARAH M. )
LONDON, and ANDREW LYNN ASHER, )
)
)
Defendants. )
)
WHEREAS, on July 9, 2025, this putative securities class action was filed (ECF 1);
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2025, this Court entered an Order (ECF 15) (the “July 2025
Order”) granting the letter-motion of Centene Corporation, Sarah M. London, and Andrew Lynn
Asher (collectively, “Defendants”) for “an adjournment of any deadline to answer or otherwise
respond to the Complaint until after the Court appoints a lead plaintiff and lead counsel”;
WHEREAS, on August 11, 2026, this Court appointed Michael Lehiani (“Lead Plaintiff”)
as lead plaintiff and approved Lead Plaintiff’s selection of counsel (ECF 38) (the “August 2026
Order”);
WHEREAS, the August 2026 Order also directed the parties to “submit a joint status report
by Thursday, August 25, 2026, regarding Lead Plaintiff’s intent to amend the complaint,
Defendants’ anticipated response to the operative Complaint, outlining a proposed briefing
schedule, if any”;
WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff intends to file an amended complaint, and Defendants
anticipate moving to dismiss that amended complaint;
Case 1:25-cv-05659-ALC Document 45 Filed 09/01/26 Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s July 2025 and August 2026 Orders, Lead Plaintiff and
Defendants have contemporaneously filed with this Stipulation and Proposed Order a joint letter
proposing a schedule for filing an amended complaint and briefing a motion to dismiss consistent
with the below;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties,
subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:
1. Lead Plaintiff’s amended complaint is due on or before November 3, 2026.
2. Pursuant to Rule 2 of the Court’s Individual Practices, Defendants will file a letter
requesting a pre-motion conference in connection with their anticipated motion to dismiss the
amended complaint on or before January 15, 2027.
3. Pursuant to Rule 2 of the Court’s Individual Practices, Lead Plaintiff will file a
response to Defendants’ pre-motion conference letter on or before January 20, 2027.
4. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint will be due 5 days from the
date of the pre-motion conference or the date of the Court’s order declining to hold a pre-motion
conference; Lead Plaintiff’s opposition will be due 77 days after Defendants’ motion to dismiss is
filed; and Defendants’ reply will be due 40 days after Lead Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
-2-
Case 1:25-cv-05659-ALC Document 45 Filed 09/01/26 Page 3 of 3
Dated: August 25, 2026
BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
/s/ Joseph A. Fonti /s/ James P. Rouhandeh
Joseph A. Fonti James P. Rouhandeh
Evan A. Kubota Antonio J. Perez-Marques
Thayne Stoddard Patrick W. Blakemore
Thomas F. Allen Marie Killmond
300 Park Avenue, Suite 1301 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
New York, New York 10022 450 Lexington Avenue
Telephone: (212) 789-1340 New York, New York 10017
Facsimile: (212) 205-3960 Telephone: (212) 450-4000
[email protected] Facsimile: (212) 701-5800
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected]
-and-
Counsel for Defendants
Adam C. McCall (pro hac vice pending)
15301 Ventura Boulevard, Suite U1
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
Telephone: (415) 445-4003
Facsimile: (212) 205-3960
[email protected]
Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the
Class
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 1, 2026
DATED____________________________
THE HONORABLE ANDREW L. CARTER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-3-
