In re: Compass Securities Litigation — Entry #69: ORDER GRANTING Motion for Relief 68 and Requiring Lead Plaintiff to File Renewed Notice of Vlountary Dismissal by Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani, hereby GRANTS…

Case: In re: Compass Securities Litigation cacd · 8:25-cv-00981

filed May 09, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #69 · filed December 05, 2025

ORDER GRANTING Motion for Relief 68 and Requiring Lead Plaintiff to File Renewed Notice of Vlountary Dismissal by Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani, hereby GRANTS the Motion for Relief 68 and ORDERS that Lead Plaintiff file a Corrected Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice along with a proposed order within five (5) calendar days from the entry of this Order. In addition, based on the status of the case, the Scheduling Conference set for 12/8/2025, at 1:30 PM., is no longer necessary and hereby VACATED. (jp) (Entered: 12/05/2025)

Who is involved

Bernard Swift
Compass Diversified Holdings
Compass Group Diversified Holdings, LLC
Compass Group Management LLC
Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Benefit Funds
Elias J Sabo
Erie County Employees' Retirement System
Glenbrook Capital Management, Inc. Employees' Profit-Sharing Plan
GTW Sub-Trust
Kevin Tan
Mordechai Haim Ferder
Nicholas Moreno
Olson 7 Management, LLC
Patrick A. Maciariello
Robert J. Matthews
Ryan J Faulkingham
Stephen Keller
The KL Kamholz Joint Revocable Trust
The Paul F. Shoen Revocable Trust
The Paxton Lee Shoen 1998 Education Trust
Todd Augenbaum

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

Applied Digital: its former name “FLIGHT SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES INC” appears in a filing in this case.
…Co-Lead Counsel. $1.2 million. • Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., (D. Conn.). Rosen Lead Counsel. $1…
Core Scientific: its name “Core Scientific, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Rosen Lead Counsel. Pang v. Levitt (Core Scientific, Inc.), No. 22-CV-1191-LY (W.D. Tex.). Rosen…

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 20, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL: https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cacd.969684/gov.uscourts.cacd.969684.69.0.pdf
Kind: court_filing
Publisher: RECAP
Published: 2026-05-14 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved: 2026-10-20 06:50:55.594714-04:00
HTTP status: 200
MIME: application/pdf
Bytes: 117973
SHA-256: 9a48c510280fc051c0781bc18afed7813604689263df907780ce6d9444a5ee81

Document text

2 page(s), 2,690 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text

Case 8:25-cv-00981-MRA-KES     Document 69       Filed 12/05/25   Page 1 of 2 Page ID
                                         #:1081


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
                                                 Case No. 8:25-cv-00981-MRA-KES
11   In re: Compass Securities Litigation
12                                               ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
     This Document Relates To: All Actions
13                                               RELIEF [68] AND REQUIRING LEAD
14                                               PLAINTIFF TO FILE RENEWED
                                                 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
15                                               DISMISSAL
16
17
18         On December 4, 2025, Lead Plaintiff Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Benefit
19   Funds moved this Court for relief, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), from
20   its October 31, 2025, voluntary dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice to
21   instead voluntarily dismiss without prejudice. ECF 68. Defendants do not oppose the
22   Motion for Relief.
23         The Court, having considered Lead Plaintiff’s request and finding good cause
24   therefor, hereby GRANTS the Motion for Relief [68] and ORDERS that Lead Plaintiff
25   file a Corrected Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice along with a proposed
26   order within five (5) calendar days from the entry of this Order. The Notice and proposed
27   order shall clearly and explicitly explain and confirm whether the voluntary dismissal
28   applies to all the individual actions that the Court consolidated, see ECF 65, and whether


                                                -1-


     Case 8:25-cv-00981-MRA-KES      Document 69       Filed 12/05/25   Page 2 of 2 Page ID
                                          #:1082


1    Lead Counsel has authority from all counsel in all those actions to dismiss this
2    Consolidated Action in its entirety. Failure to provide this information will delay dismissal
3    of this case. In addition, based on the status of the case, the Scheduling Conference set for
4    December 8, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. is no longer necessary and hereby VACATED.
5
6          IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9    Dated: December 5, 2025                     ___________________________________
10                                               HON. MONICA RAMIREZ ALMADANI
                                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


                                                 -2-