Lillian Jurdi v. Nike, Inc. — Entry #50
Case: Lillian Jurdi v. Nike, Inc. cacd · 2:24-cv-08093
filed September 20, 2024
What this document is
Docket entry #50 · filed June 17, 2025
Who is involved
- Does
- Lillian Jurdi
- Nike, Inc.
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
…............. 27 24 Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., 25 962 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (N.D. Cal.…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 10, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 2,956 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 2:24-cv-08093-FLA-E Document 50 Filed 06/17/25 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#:689
1 JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 LILLIAN JURDI, Case No. 2:24-cv-08093-FLA (Ex)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
13 v. [DKT. 49] AND DENYING AS
MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION
14 TO DISMISS [DKT. 20]
NIKE INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case 2:24-cv-08093-FLA-E Document 50 Filed 06/17/25 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
#:690
1 On June 16, 2025, Plaintiff Lillian Jurdi (“Plaintiff”) filed a Notice of
2 Voluntary Dismissal (Dkt. 49), requesting the court dismiss the action without
3 prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) (“Rule 41(a)(1)”), which allows a
4 plaintiff to dismiss an action voluntarily without a court order by filing: “(i) a notice
5 of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
6 summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
7 appeared.”
8 Plaintiff is not entitled to dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) because
9 Defendant Nike Inc. (“Defendant”) filed its Answer on December 19, 2024. See Dkt.
10 20. Further, as Plaintiff did not submit a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties
11 who appeared, Plaintiff is not entitled to dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The
12 court, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff’s request for dismissal.
13 Nevertheless, as Defendant has not filed an opposition to the Notice of
14 Voluntary Dismissal, the court, on its own motion, hereby VACATES all pending
15 dates and deadlines and DISMISSES the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
16 41(a)(2). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 20, is DENIED as moot. The court
17 retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within thirty (30) days
18 from the date of this Order, should Defendant file timely an objection to the dismissal.
19
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22 Dated: June 17, 2025
23 _______________________________
FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA
24
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
2