Lillian Jurdi v. Nike, Inc.
cacd · 2:24-cv-08093
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
…............. 27 24 Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., 25 962 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (N.D. Cal.…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Does | Defendant | |
| Nike, Inc. | Defendant | , , |
| Lillian Jurdi | Plaintiff | , , |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=69182289&page_size=40
#52 · 2025-07-08
(no description on the docket) Read the filing
#51 · 2025-06-23
(no description on the docket)
#50 · 2025-06-17
(no description on the docket) Read the filing
#49 · 2025-06-16
(no description on the docket)
#48 · 2025-05-14
(no description on the docket)
#47 · 2025-05-09
(no description on the docket)
#46 · 2025-05-09
(no description on the docket) Read the filing
#45 · 2025-05-09
(no description on the docket)
#44 · 2025-05-07
STIPLATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re: Notice of Joint Protective Order 43 . FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for details) (vmun) Read the filing
#43 · 2025-05-06
(no description on the docket)
#42 · 2025-05-05
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-05-02
(no description on the docket)
#40 · 2025-05-01
(no description on the docket)
#39 · 2025-04-16
(no description on the docket)
#38 · 2025-04-10
(no description on the docket)
#36 · 2025-02-04
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION OF DEFENDANT NICKE, INC. TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 20 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court finds that the Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint currently scheduled for hearing on February 7, 2025, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, this motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. The court expects the parties to continue litigating this action diligently, while awaiting the court's ruling on this motion. No appearances are necessar
#33 · 2025-01-30
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the court VACATES the January 31, 2025, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/30/2025)
#22 · 2024-12-27
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: In light of Plaintiff's filing of a first amended complaint (Dkt. 16 ), the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. 11 ) is DENIED as moot. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2024)
#19 · 2024-12-16
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order Re Transfer Pursuant filed on December 9, 2024. Judge Aenlle-Rocha hears civil motions on Fridays at 1:30 p.m. Therefore, the court hereby resets the hearing on Motion of Defendant Nike, Inc. to Dismiss Complaint (Dkt. 11 ) from January 13, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. to January 17, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. The deadlines for filing the opposition
#37 · 2025-02-17
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lennette W Lee counsel for Defendant Nike, Inc.. Adding Lennette Lee as counsel of record for Nike Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Nike Inc.. (Attorney Lennette W Lee added to party Nike, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lee, Lennette) (Entered: 02/17/2025)