jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 10, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Lillian Jurdi v. Nike, Inc. — Entry #52

Case: Lillian Jurdi v. Nike, Inc. cacd · 2:24-cv-08093

filed September 20, 2024

What this document is

Docket entry #52 · filed July 08, 2025

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 10, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cacd.941690/gov.uscourts.cacd.941690.52.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2025-07-08 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-11-10 06:47:32.789044-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
155076
SHA-256
d63e47da01d2677b66df6b6c016514d25bd2e05a4b530d4ad73bffedf3a9436c

Document text

2 page(s), 2,142 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 2:24-cv-08093-FLA-E    Document 52 Filed 07/07/25   Page 1 of 2 Page ID
                                        #:694


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9                            CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11     LILLIAN JURDI,                           Case No. 2:24-cv-08093-FLA (Ex)
12                              Plaintiff,
                                                ORDER VACATING ORDER
13                 v.                           DISMISSING ACTION [DKT. 50]
                                                AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S
14                                              MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT
       NIKE, INC., et al.,                      [DKT. 20]
15
                                Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                               1


     Case 2:24-cv-08093-FLA-E     Document 52 Filed 07/07/25        Page 2 of 2 Page ID
                                         #:695


1            On June 16, 2025, Plaintiff Lillian Jurdi (“Plaintiff”) filed a Notice of
2      Dismissal, dismissing the action in its entirety without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.
3      Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Dkt. 49. On June 17, 2025, the court issued an Order
4      Dismissing Action, Dkt. 50, in error as no order of dismissal was required as
5      Defendant Nike, Inc. (“Defendant”) had neither filed an answer nor a motion for
6      summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
7            Accordingly, the court VACATES the Order Dismissing Action, Dkt. 50,
8      consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). All dates and deadlines governing this
9      action are VACATED. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 20, is DENIED as moot.
10
11           IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13     Dated: July 7, 2025                           _______________________________
                                                     FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA
14
                                                     United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

                                                 2