Case 2:24-cv-08093-FLA-E    Document 50 Filed 06/17/25   Page 1 of 2 Page ID
                                        #:689


1                                                                        JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9                           CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11     LILLIAN JURDI,                           Case No. 2:24-cv-08093-FLA (Ex)
12                              Plaintiff,
                                                ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
13                v.                            [DKT. 49] AND DENYING AS
                                                MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION
14                                              TO DISMISS [DKT. 20]
       NIKE INC., et al.,
15
                                Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                               1


     Case 2:24-cv-08093-FLA-E      Document 50 Filed 06/17/25        Page 2 of 2 Page ID
                                          #:690


1            On June 16, 2025, Plaintiff Lillian Jurdi (“Plaintiff”) filed a Notice of
2      Voluntary Dismissal (Dkt. 49), requesting the court dismiss the action without
3      prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) (“Rule 41(a)(1)”), which allows a
4      plaintiff to dismiss an action voluntarily without a court order by filing: “(i) a notice
5      of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
6      summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
7      appeared.”
8            Plaintiff is not entitled to dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) because
9      Defendant Nike Inc. (“Defendant”) filed its Answer on December 19, 2024. See Dkt.
10     20. Further, as Plaintiff did not submit a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties
11     who appeared, Plaintiff is not entitled to dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The
12     court, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff’s request for dismissal.
13           Nevertheless, as Defendant has not filed an opposition to the Notice of
14     Voluntary Dismissal, the court, on its own motion, hereby VACATES all pending
15     dates and deadlines and DISMISSES the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
16     41(a)(2). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 20, is DENIED as moot. The court
17     retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within thirty (30) days
18     from the date of this Order, should Defendant file timely an objection to the dismissal.
19
20           IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22     Dated: June 17, 2025
23                                                     _______________________________
                                                       FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA
24
                                                       United States District Judge
25
26
27
28

                                                   2