Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc.
pamd · 1:25-cv-00927
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its subsidiary “Sullivan Company” appears in a filing in this case.
…Staltari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, company as [Defendant].” (Id. ¶ 28.) Gillam…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| ViaSat, Inc. | Defendant | , , , |
| Asher Bronstin | Plaintiff | , |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=70376835&page_size=40
#82 · 2026-09-23
Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to The Preferred Prepaid, Inc. Signed on 09/23/2026. (ibr) Read the filing
#81 · 2026-09-10
REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT by Asher Bronstin. (Perrong, Andrew) Read the filing
#80 · 2026-09-10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Asher Bronstin The Preferred Prepaid, Inc. served on 6/29/2026, answer due 7/20/2026. (Perrong, Andrew) Read the filing
#79 · 2026-08-11
ANSWER to [70] Amended Complaint by ViaSat, Inc..(Salem, Kareem) Read the filing
#78 · 2026-07-17
SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Kareem Salem. Signed by Honorable Keli M. Neary on 7/17/2026. (mw) Read the filing
#77 · 2026-07-16
ORDER granting [76] Motion for Extension of Time to File - Defendants shall have until August 12, 2026 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the SAC. Signed by Honorable Keli M. Neary on 7/16/2026 (mw) Read the filing
#76 · 2026-07-16
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Second Amended Complaint by The Preferred Prepaid, Inc., ViaSat, Inc.. (Attachments: (1) Proposed Order)(Heeringa, Paul) Read the filing Read the filing
#75 · 2026-07-15
PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Kareem Salem on behalf of ViaSat, Inc. Attorney Kareem Salem is seeking special admission Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-7496150., filed by on behalf of ViaSat, Inc..(Salem, Kareem) Read the filing
#74 · 2026-06-22
Summons Issued as to The Preferred Prepaid, Inc. and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (ibr) Read the filing
#73 · 2026-06-18
ORDER granting the Parties' Request to Stay Discovery and Continue Response Deadline. Signed by Honorable Keli M. Neary on 6/18/2026. (mw) Read the filing
#72 · 2026-06-17
STATUS REPORT And Proposed Order by Asher Bronstin. (Attachments: (1) Proposed Order)(Perrong, Andrew)
#71 · 2026-06-15
STATUS REPORT Joint Report Regarding Discovery Status and Proposed Case Management Deadlines by Asher Bronstin. (Perrong, Andrew)
#70 · 2026-06-11
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Asher Bronstin.(mw)
#69 · 2026-06-09
ORDER (Memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - it is hereby ORDERED that Bronstin's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. 49) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall docket the proposed amended complaint (Doc. 49-1) as the Second Amended Complaint. Viasat's motion (Doc. 23) to dismiss the First Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot due to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. The parties' dueling motions (Docs. 57, 61) for sanctions are DENIED. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Keli M. Neary on 6/9/2026 (mw)
#68 · 2026-06-09
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Keli M. Neary on 6/9/2026. (mw)
#67 · 2026-04-28
REPLY BRIEF re 61 MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant and its Counsel filed by Asher Bronstin.(Perrong, Andrew) (Entered: 04/28/2026)
#66 · 2026-04-15
REPLY BRIEF re 57 MOTION for Sanctions filed by ViaSat, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Heeringa, Paul) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
#- · 2026-04-15
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to refile docket entry 65 using the correct event: Civil Events - Motions and Related Filings - Responses and Replies (Briefs) -- Brief in Opposition (Do not use for Summary Judgment Motions). (ibr) -- (PLEASE DISREGARD THIS ANNOTATION, ATTORNEY USED CORRECT DOCKET EVENT)
#65 · 2026-04-14
RESPONSE in Opposition re 61 MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant and its Counsel, filed by ViaSat, Inc.. Related document: 61 MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant and its Counsel filed by Asher Bronstin. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Heeringa, Paul) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
#64 · 2026-04-01
BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re 57 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Asher Bronstin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A - Discovery Responses, # 2 Unpublished Opinion(s) Unpublished Opinions, # 3 Proposed Order)(Perrong, Andrew) (Entered: 04/01/2026)