jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 03, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc. — Entry #77: ORDER granting [76] Motion for Extension of Time to File - Defendants shall have until August 12, 2026 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the SAC

Case: Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc. pamd · 1:25-cv-00927

filed May 26, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #77 · filed July 16, 2026

ORDER granting [76] Motion for Extension of Time to File - Defendants shall have until August 12, 2026 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the SAC. Signed by Honorable Keli M. Neary on 7/16/2026 (mw)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 03, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.pamd.146892/gov.uscourts.pamd.146892.77.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2026-07-16 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-11-03 06:50:49.240387-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
144229
SHA-256
f40a02cbbb531bc3dba48cdd3db82cb947c74aaac7b940478a0a102809f93179

Document text

1 page(s), 1,548 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:25-cv-00927-KMN         Document 77      Filed 07/16/26     Page 1 of 1


                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                  FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 ASHER BRONSTIN, individually and on
 behalf of all other similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,
                                                Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00927-KMN
 v.
                                                (Hon. Keli M. Neary)
 VIASAT, INC.,

 and

 THE PREFERRED PREPAID, INC.
 d/b/a XYZies

 Defendants.


 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
            FILE RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT


       This matter, coming to be heard on Defendants “Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for

Defendants to File Response to Second Amended Complaint” (hereafter, the “Motion”), due notice

having been given, the Court being fully apprised in the premises thereof, the Motion being

unopposed, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (a) the Motion is

GRANTED for the reasons stated therein; and (b) Defendants shall have until August 12, 2026

to answer, move or otherwise respond to the SAC.

       SO ORDERED THIS 16th DAY OF JULY, 2026,


                                                             /s/ Keli M. Neary
                                                         By:___________________________

                                                                 Hon. Keli M. Neary

                                                                 United States District Judge