Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc. — Entry #76: Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Second Amended Complaint by The Preferred Prepaid, Inc., ViaSat, Inc
Case: Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc. pamd · 1:25-cv-00927
filed May 26, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #76 · filed July 16, 2026
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Second Amended Complaint by The Preferred Prepaid, Inc., ViaSat, Inc.. (Attachments: (1) Proposed Order)(Heeringa, Paul)
Who is involved
- Asher Bronstin
- ViaSat, Inc.
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its subsidiary “Sullivan Company” appears in a filing in this case.
…Staltari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, company as [Defendant].” (Id. ¶ 28.) Gillam…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 03, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 5,486 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:25-cv-00927-KMN Document 76 Filed 07/16/26 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ASHER BRONSTIN, individually and on
behalf of all other similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00927-KMN
v.
(Hon. Keli M. Neary)
VIASAT, INC.,
and
THE PREFERRED PREPAID, INC.
d/b/a XYZies
Defendants.
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE
TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants Viasat, Inc. (“Viasat”) and The Preferred Prepaid, Inc. d/b/a XYZies
(“XYZies”), collectively (“Defendants”) respectfully submit this unopposed motion to extend the
time by which Defendants must submit a response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (see
Dkt. 70, “SAC”), to August 12, 2026. In support thereof, Defendants states the following:
1. Plaintiff filed his SAC in this action on June 11, 2026. See Dkt. 70.
2. On June 18, 2026, the Court ordered that Viasat’s deadline to respond to the SAC
shall be extended to the same deadline applicable to XYZies following service, so that both
defendants may respond on the same schedule. See Dkt. 723.
3. On June 27, 2026, XYZies was served with a copy of the SAC.
4. According to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 15, XYZies deadline to
respond to the SAC is July 20, 2026.
5. On July 14, 2026, XYZies counsel, Joe Samo, requested an extension of XYZies
Case 1:25-cv-00927-KMN Document 76 Filed 07/16/26 Page 2 of 3
response deadline to August 12, 2026.1
6. Plaintiff’s counsel agreed to extend XYZies and Viasat’s deadline to respond to the
SAC to August 12, 2026.
7. Pursuant to the requested and agreed to extension, if granted, Defendant’s new
deadline to answer, move or otherwise respond to the SAC would be August 12, 2026.
8. This is the Defendants’ first request for an extension of this deadline.
9. No other case deadlines will be impacted by the requested extension.
10. This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
11. No party to this action will be unduly prejudiced by the granting of the requested
extension of time, especially as the parties are in agreement. An extension will not impact the
timely resolution of this matter, or any other deadlines, as this case is still in its early stages.
12. Thus, Defendants respectfully submits that there is sufficient “good cause” to grant
the requested extension, for at least the reasons provided above.
WHEREFORE, for all of the reasons above, Defendants respectfully request that the Court
enter an order extending its deadline to answer, move or otherwise respond to the SAC would be
August 12, 2026. A proposed order has been included for the Court’s consideration.
Dated: July 16, 2026 Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ A. Paul Heeringa
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIP, LLP
1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: 202-585-6500
jmcguinness@manatt.com
pheeringa@manatt.com
1
Although Mr. Samo has not formally entered an appearance in this matter he has agreed to allow his signature on
this motion.
2
Case 1:25-cv-00927-KMN Document 76 Filed 07/16/26 Page 3 of 3
FREDERICK P. SANTARELLI (PA 53901)
STEVEN C. TOLLIVER, JR. (PA 327165)
ELLIOTT GREENLEAF, P.C.
Union Meeting Corporate Center V
925 Harvest Drive, Suite 300
Blue Bell, PA 19422
(215) 977-1000 (phone)
FPSantarelli@elliottgreenleaf.com
sct@elliottgreenleaf.com
Counsel for Defendant Viasat, Inc.
By: /s/ Joe Samo
Counsel for Defendant XYZies
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, on July 16, 2026, I filed the foregoing electronically through the Court’s
CM/ECF system, which caused the following parties or counsel to be served by electronic means on
all parties and their respective counsel of record.
/s/ A. Paul Heeringa
3
