Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc. — Entry #73: ORDER granting the Parties' Request to Stay Discovery and Continue Response Deadline
Case: Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc. pamd · 1:25-cv-00927
filed May 26, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #73 · filed June 18, 2026
ORDER granting the Parties' Request to Stay Discovery and Continue Response Deadline. Signed by Honorable Keli M. Neary on 6/18/2026. (mw)
Who is involved
- Asher Bronstin
- ViaSat, Inc.
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its subsidiary “Sullivan Company” appears in a filing in this case.
…Staltari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, company as [Defendant].” (Id. ¶ 28.) Gillam…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 03, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 2,158 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:25-cv-00927-KMN Document 73 Filed 06/18/26 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ASHER BRONSTIN, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00927-KMN
v. (Hon. Keli M. Neary)
VIASAT, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’ REQUEST TO STAY DISCOVERY
AND CONTINUE RESPONSE DEADLINE
The Court, having received, reviewed, and considered the parties (“Joint
Report Regarding Discovery Status and Proposed Case Management Deadlines”)
filed in the above-captioned matter, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. All discovery in this matter shall be stayed until Plaintiff serves Defendant
The Preferred Prepaid, Inc. d/b/a XYZies (“XYZies”) and XYZies files a
responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”).
2. Viasat’s deadline to respond to the SAC shall be extended to the same deadline
applicable to XYZies following service, so that both defendants may respond
on the same schedule.
1
Case 1:25-cv-00927-KMN Document 73 Filed 06/18/26 Page 2 of 2
3. Once a responsive pleading is filed by XYZies and Viasat, discovery
thereafter shall proceed only as to Plaintiff’s individual claims, consistent with
the Court’s bifurcation order (Doc. 36).
4. Discovery shall remain bifurcated, with a 90-day period of individual
discovery followed by a status conference to set a schedule for any summary
judgment briefing on Plaintiff’s individual claims.
SO ORDERED THIS 18th DAY OF JUNE, 2026
/s/ Keli M. Neary
By:_____________________________
Hon. Keli M. Neary
United States District Judge
2
