jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 03, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc. — Entry #73: ORDER granting the Parties' Request to Stay Discovery and Continue Response Deadline

Case: Bronstin v. ViaSat, Inc. pamd · 1:25-cv-00927

filed May 26, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #73 · filed June 18, 2026

ORDER granting the Parties' Request to Stay Discovery and Continue Response Deadline. Signed by Honorable Keli M. Neary on 6/18/2026. (mw)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 03, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.pamd.146892/gov.uscourts.pamd.146892.73.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2026-06-18 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-11-03 06:50:54.626740-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
118790
SHA-256
8c5836ba9505ed194d56a6afabef9d98440a625eff0061dc3e5c4eb3da2fc3ef

Document text

2 page(s), 2,158 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:25-cv-00927-KMN      Document 73        Filed 06/18/26   Page 1 of 2


                  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
              FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


ASHER BRONSTIN, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,
                                                 Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00927-KMN
v.                                               (Hon. Keli M. Neary)

VIASAT, INC.,

 Defendant.

  ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’ REQUEST TO STAY DISCOVERY
            AND CONTINUE RESPONSE DEADLINE

        The Court, having received, reviewed, and considered the parties (“Joint

Report Regarding Discovery Status and Proposed Case Management Deadlines”)

filed in the above-captioned matter, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

     1. All discovery in this matter shall be stayed until Plaintiff serves Defendant

        The Preferred Prepaid, Inc. d/b/a XYZies (“XYZies”) and XYZies files a

        responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”).

     2. Viasat’s deadline to respond to the SAC shall be extended to the same deadline

        applicable to XYZies following service, so that both defendants may respond

        on the same schedule.


                                             1


    Case 1:25-cv-00927-KMN       Document 73      Filed 06/18/26   Page 2 of 2


  3. Once a responsive pleading is filed by XYZies and Viasat, discovery

    thereafter shall proceed only as to Plaintiff’s individual claims, consistent with

    the Court’s bifurcation order (Doc. 36).

  4. Discovery shall remain bifurcated, with a 90-day period of individual

    discovery followed by a status conference to set a schedule for any summary

    judgment briefing on Plaintiff’s individual claims.


SO ORDERED THIS 18th DAY OF JUNE, 2026


                                           /s/ Keli M. Neary
                                      By:_____________________________
                                            Hon. Keli M. Neary
                                            United States District Judge


                                        2