Teman v. Deel, Inc.
nysd · 1:25-cv-05852
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CoreWeave: its name “CoreWeave” appears in a filing in this case.
…But a hot-performing I.P.O. — along with one by CoreWeave, an A.I. start-up — could help revive the moribund…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Andreessen Horowitz | Defendant | |
| Marc Andreessen | Defendant | |
| Amy McCann Roller | Defendant | |
| Daniel Watkins | Defendant | |
| Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLP | Defendant | |
| Spiros Komis | Defendant | |
| Josie Nicholls | Defendant | |
| Caleb Seet | Defendant | |
| Alex Palmer | Defendant | |
| Shelby Ueckerman | Defendant | |
| Michael Tsakirellis | Defendant | |
| Alex Bouaziz | Defendant | |
| Deel, Inc. | Defendant | |
| GateGuard, Inc. | Plaintiff | |
| Ari B. Teman | Plaintiff |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=70818963&page_size=40
#- · 2026-01-13
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 25. Mailed to: Ari B. Teman 1521 Alton Road #888 Miami Beach, FL 33139. (ne)
#- · 2026-01-13
(no description on the docket)
#25 · 2026-01-12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL... It is hereby ORDERED that the case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. This Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/12/26) (yv) Read the filing
#- · 2025-12-08
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 24. Mailed to: Ari B. Teman 1521 Alton Road #888 Miami Beach, FL 33139. (anc)
#- · 2025-12-08
(no description on the docket)
#24 · 2025-12-05
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Complaint in this case was filed with the Court on July 15, 2025, see ECF No. 1, and summons were issued on September 5, 2025, but the docket does not reflect that the Complaint was ever served on the Defendants. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff communicate with the Court, in writing, as to why Plaintiff has failed to serve the summons and Complaint within the 90 days prescribed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, if Plaintiff believes that the Defendants have been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If the C Read the filing
#- · 2025-10-23
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 23. Mailed to: Ari B. Teman 1521 Alton Road #888 Miami Beach, FL 33139. (aan)
#- · 2025-10-23
(no description on the docket)
#23 · 2025-10-22
ORDER: Accordingly, GateGuard's claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate GateGuard as a Plaintiff in this case and to mail this Order to Plaintiff Ari B. Teman. SO ORDERED. GateGuard, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/21/2025) (tg) (Entered: 10/22/2025) Read the filing
#- · 2025-09-16
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 22. Mailed to: GateGuard,Inc. ; Ari B. Teman 1521 Alton Road #888 Miami Beach, FL 33139. (nb)
#- · 2025-09-09
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 20. Mailed to: GateGuard,Inc. ; Ari B. Teman 1521 Alton Road #888 Miami Beach, FL 33139. (lab)
#- · 2025-09-05
Mailed a copy of Summons Issued, to Ari B. Teman,1521 Alton Road, #888, Miami Beach, FL 33139. (vn)
#- · 2025-09-05
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Marc Andreessen, Alex Bouaziz, Deel, Inc., Andreessen Horowitz, Spiros Komis, Amy McCann Roller, Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLP, Josie Nicholls, Alex Palmer, Caleb Seet, Michael Tsakirellis, Shelby Ueckerman, Daniel Watkins. (vn)
#- · 2025-09-16
(no description on the docket)
#22 · 2025-09-15
ORDER granting 21 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED. GateGuard's deadline to respond to the Court's Orders dated July 30, 2025, ECF No. 3, and September 8, 2025, ECF No. 20, is hereby EXTENDED to October 6, 2025. If, by that date, GateGuard fails to either obtain counsel or show cause why it should be permitted to proceed without counsel, its claims will be dismissed without prejudice without further notice to the parties. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 21 and to mail this Order to Plaintiff Ari B. Teman. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M.
#21 · 2025-09-12
NOTICE OF TRANSITION OF CORPORATE LEADERSHIP AND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Ari Teman dated 9/12/25. Document filed by Ari B. Teman.(yv) (Entered: 09/12/2025)
#- · 2025-09-09
(no description on the docket)
#20 · 2025-09-08
ORDER: On July 30, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff GateGuard to obtain counsel within thirty days or show cause why it should be permitted to proceed without counsel. ECF No. 3. So far, GateGuard has failed to do either. As a courtesy, that deadline is hereby EXTENDED, nunc pro tunc, to September 15, 2025. If, by that date, GateGuard fails to either obtain counsel or show cause why it should be permitted to proceed without counsel, its claims will be dismissed without prejudice without further notice to the parties. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail this Order to Plaintiff Ari B. Teman.
#- · 2025-09-05
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-09-05
(no description on the docket)