Teman v. Deel, Inc. — Entry #24: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Complaint in this case was filed with the Court on July 15, 2025, see ECF No
Case: Teman v. Deel, Inc. nysd · 1:25-cv-05852
filed July 15, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #24 · filed December 05, 2025
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Complaint in this case was filed with the Court on July 15, 2025, see ECF No. 1, and summons were issued on September 5, 2025, but the docket does not reflect that the Complaint was ever served on the Defendants. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff communicate with the Court, in writing, as to why Plaintiff has failed to serve the summons and Complaint within the 90 days prescribed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, if Plaintiff believes that the Defendants have been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If the Court does not receive any communication from Plaintiff by January 5, 2026, showing good cause why such service was not made within the 90 days, the Court will dismiss the case without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Show Cause Response due by 1/5/2026. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/5/2025) (jjc) (Entered: 12/05/2025)
Who is involved
- Alex Bouaziz
- Alex Palmer
- Amy McCann Roller
- Andreessen Horowitz
- Ari B. Teman
- Caleb Seet
- Daniel Watkins
- Deel, Inc.
- GateGuard, Inc.
- Josie Nicholls
- Marc Andreessen
- Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLP
- Michael Tsakirellis
- Shelby Ueckerman
- Spiros Komis
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CoreWeave: its name “CoreWeave” appears in a filing in this case.
…But a hot-performing I.P.O. — along with one by CoreWeave, an A.I. start-up — could help revive the moribund…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 29, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 2,472 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:25-cv-05852-JMF Document 24 Filed 12/05/25 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------
X
:
ARI B. TEMAN, et al., :
:
Plaintiffs, : 25-CV-5852 (JMF)
:
-v- : ORDER TO SHOW
: CAUSE
DEEL, INC., et al., :
:
Defendants. :
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge:
The Complaint in this case was filed with the Court on July 15, 2025, see ECF No. 1, and
summons were issued on September 5, 2025, but the docket does not reflect that the Complaint
was ever served on the Defendants. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff
communicate with the Court, in writing, as to why Plaintiff has failed to serve the summons and
Complaint within the 90 days prescribed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
or, if Plaintiff believes that the Defendants have been served, when and in what manner such
service was made.
If the Court does not receive any communication from Plaintiff by January 5, 2026,
showing good cause why such service was not made within the 90 days, the Court will dismiss
the case without further notice.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 5, 2025 __________________________________
New York, New York JESSE M. FURMAN
United States District Judge