Teman v. Deel, Inc. — Entry #23: ORDER: Accordingly, GateGuard's claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice
Case: Teman v. Deel, Inc. nysd · 1:25-cv-05852
filed July 15, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #23 · filed October 22, 2025
ORDER: Accordingly, GateGuard's claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate GateGuard as a Plaintiff in this case and to mail this Order to Plaintiff Ari B. Teman. SO ORDERED. GateGuard, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/21/2025) (tg) (Entered: 10/22/2025)
Who is involved
- Alex Bouaziz
- Alex Palmer
- Amy McCann Roller
- Andreessen Horowitz
- Ari B. Teman
- Caleb Seet
- Daniel Watkins
- Deel, Inc.
- GateGuard, Inc.
- Josie Nicholls
- Marc Andreessen
- Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch LLP
- Michael Tsakirellis
- Shelby Ueckerman
- Spiros Komis
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CoreWeave: its name “CoreWeave” appears in a filing in this case.
…But a hot-performing I.P.O. — along with one by CoreWeave, an A.I. start-up — could help revive the moribund…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 29, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 2,240 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:25-cv-05852-JMF Document 23 Filed 10/22/25 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
ARI B. TEMAN, et al., :
:
Plaintiffs, :
: 25-CV-5852 (JMF)
-v- :
: ORDER
DEEL, INC., et al., :
:
Defendants. :
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge:
On July 30, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff GateGuard to obtain counsel within thirty
days or show cause why it should be permitted to proceed without counsel. ECF No. 3. As a
courtesy, the Court extended that deadline to September 15, 2025, ECF No. 20, and extended it
again at Plaintiffs’ request to October 6, 2025, ECF No. 22. In both Orders, the Court noted that
a failure to obtain counsel or show cause by the deadline would result in GateGuard’s claims
being dismissed without prejudice. GateGuard has failed to do either. Accordingly,
GateGuard’s claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate GateGuard as a Plaintiff in this case and to
mail this Order to Plaintiff Ari B. Teman.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2025 __________________________________
New York, New York JESSE M. FURMAN
United States District Judge