Hayes v. City of Dallas
txnd · 3:23-cv-02271
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its name “Applied Digital Corporation” appears in a filing in this case.
…LLC 90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al 91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Dallas Police Officers | Defendant | |
| Holly Harris | Defendant | , |
| Walter Paul Guab | Defendant | , |
| City of Dallas | Defendant | , |
| Silvester Hayes | Plaintiff | , |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=67883583&page_size=40
#58 · 2025-07-02
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-06-09
(no description on the docket)
#52 · 2025-04-25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 30 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is DISMSISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 4/25/2025) (axm) Read the filing
#53 · 2025-04-25
FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Silvester Hayes take nothing by his claims against Defendants. Court costs are taxed against Plaintiff. All relief not expressly granted is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 4/25/2025) (axm) (Entered: 04/25/2025) Read the filing
#51 · 2025-03-25
ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. The reasoning for the Court's ruling will follow in a separate memorandum opinion and order. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 3/25/2025) (ndt) (Entered: 03/26/2025) Read the filing
#50 · 2024-08-23
Special Order No. 3-354: Effective August 23, 2024, the cases listed on Exhibit A to this order are transferred to Magistrate Judge Brian McKay and shall henceforth carry the suffix letters BW. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-354. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Brian W McKay on 8/23/2024) (rekc) (Entered: 08/23/2024) Read the filing
#49 · 2024-07-05
REPLY filed by City of Dallas, Walter Paul Guab, Holly Harris re: 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Wilson Gowin, Lindsay) (Entered: 07/05/2024) Read the filing
#48 · 2024-07-01
ELECTRONIC ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that 47 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, to and including July 5, 2024, is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 7/1/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 07/01/2024)
#47 · 2024-06-28
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by City of Dallas, Walter Paul Guab, Holly Harris (Wilson Gowin, Lindsay) (Entered: 06/28/2024)
#46 · 2024-06-21
NOTICE of CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS filed by Silvester Hayes (Robinius, Mark) (Main Document 46 replaced on 6/21/2024) (kaf). (Entered: 06/21/2024)
#45 · 2024-06-21
ELECTRONIC ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that 44 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, to and including June 28, 2024, is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/21/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 06/21/2024)
#44 · 2024-06-20
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by City of Dallas, Walter Paul Guab, Holly Harris (Wilson Gowin, Lindsay) (Entered: 06/20/2024)
#43 · 2024-06-20
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by City of Dallas, Walter Paul Guab, Holly Harris. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Wilson Gowin, Lindsay) (Entered: 06/20/2024)
#41 · 2024-06-05
Appendix in Support filed by Silvester Hayes re 39 Response/Objection, 40 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion Appendix in Support of Plaintiff's Response/Objection and Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Response/Objection to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits 1,2,3) (Robinius, Mark) (Entered: 06/05/2024)
#40 · 2024-06-05
Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Silvester Hayes re 39 Response/Objection Brief/Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Response/Objection to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement (Robinius, Mark) (Entered: 06/05/2024)
#39 · 2024-06-05
RESPONSE AND OBJECTION filed by Silvester Hayes re: 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Robinius, Mark) (Entered: 06/05/2024)
#- · 2024-07-01
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-06-21
(no description on the docket)
#42 · 2024-06-20
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 3.1 requires that a complaint be accompanied by "a separately signed certificate of interested persons." Local Rule 7.4 requires that the "initial responsive pleading or motion filed in lieu of a responsive pleading that a defendant files in a civil action must be accompanied by a separately signed certificate of interested persons that complies with LR 3.1(c) or 3.2(e)." To date, no party has done so. Accordingly, the parties are ordered to file the signed certificates by July 1, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/20/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 06/20/2024)
#- · 2024-06-20
(no description on the docket)
