Hayes v. City of Dallas — Entry #51: ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment
Case: Hayes v. City of Dallas txnd · 3:23-cv-02271
filed October 16, 2023
What this document is
Docket entry #51 · filed March 25, 2025
ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. The reasoning for the Court's ruling will follow in a separate memorandum opinion and order. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 3/25/2025) (ndt) (Entered: 03/26/2025)
Who is involved
- City of Dallas
- Dallas Police Officers
- Holly Harris
- Silvester Hayes
- Walter Paul Guab
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its name “Applied Digital Corporation” appears in a filing in this case.
…LLC 90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al 91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 23, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,866 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 3:23-cv-02271-S Document 51 Filed 03/25/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID 616
United States District Court
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
S I LV E S T E R H AY E S
§
V . §
§ C I V I L A C T I O N N O . 3 : 2 3 - C V- 2 2 7 1 - S
CITY OF DALLAS, HOLLY HARRIS, §
WALTER PAUL GUAB, and DALLAS §
POLICE OFFICERS DOES 1 §
THROUGH 10 §
O R D E R
This Order addresses Defendants Holly Harris, Walter Guab, and the City of Dallas’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) [ECF No. 30]. The Court has reviewed the Motion,
Defendants’ Brief in Support of the Motion (“Defendants’ Brief’) [ECF No. 31], Plaintiff Silvester
Hayes’s Response in Opposition to the Motion [ECF No. 39], Plaintiffs Brief in Support of the
Response [ECF No. 40], Defendants’ Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 49], the summary
judgment evidence, and the applicable law. The Court GRANTS the Motion in its entirety.
including the request to sua sponte dismiss Defendants Dallas Police Of cers Does 1Through 10.
See Defs.’ Br. 6n.2. The reasoning for the Court’s ruling will follow in aseparate memorandum
opinion and order.
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED March 25, 2025.
KAREN GREN SCHOLER
UNITED S TAT E S DISTRICT JUDGE
fi
