Cerebras contract at MTL-3

Subject kind: customer
Statement date: 2026-03-25
Promised amount: 979.0 USD/month
Current status: stated

The claim, verbatim

MTL-3 facility commenced billing Cerebras as of November 1, 2025 at CAD 1.4 million (approximately $979 thousand USD) monthly for a five-year contract with 5 MW IT load

Source (primary)

WhiteFiber 10-K filed 2026-03-26 (SEC EDGAR, sec_filing)
View cached copy (2026-08-31)Live source ↗

Quote: “The site has commenced billing Cerebras as of November 1, 2025, in the amount of CAD 1.4 million (approximately 979 thousand USD) monthly for the duration of the five-year contract.”

How we checked this

Checked on September 15, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.

The filing gives the billing start date, the monthly amount, the five-year term and Cerebras's 5 MW IT load contracted capacity.

Confirmed in the source:

MTL-3 commenced billing Cerebras as of November 1, 2025
Billing is CAD 1.4 million (approximately $979 thousand) monthly
The Cerebras contract runs five years
The Cerebras contracted capacity is 5 MW IT load

What we did: Read our cached copy of SEC EDGAR (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2042022/000121390026034341/ea0278305-10k_white.htm) in full (600,249 characters, retrieved August 31, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.

Additional evidence

confirms WhiteFiber 10-K filed 2026-03-26

Quote: “The site has commenced billing Cerebras as of November 1, 2025, in the amount of CAD 1.4 million (approximately 979 thousand USD) monthly for the duration of the five-year contract.”

View cached copy (2026-08-31)Live source ↗

Record of changes

September 1, 2026 — statedlater found incorrect

Automated extraction from the cited source. ~~Recorded automatically from the cited source when it was published, then queued for evidence review.~~

September 2, 2026 — withdrawnlater found incorrect

Evidence review against the cited source. ~~The source supports the billing date, amount, and contract duration, but does not contain any mention of the '5 MW IT load' specification included in the published claim.~~

September 2, 2026 — stated

Correction after re-verification. Re-verification found the cited source does support this claim. The earlier withdrawal was made in error and has been reversed. The attributed quote appears verbatim in the cited source (deterministic check).