Court finding on location of alleged infringing activity
Company: Core Scientific - Project: Denton
The claim, verbatim
The court found that a significant share of the alleged infringement occurred in the Eastern District (Denton), from which Core moved the accused machines, and that a similar share occurred and continues to occur in the Western District. This finding concerns location only, not infringement liability.
Source (primary)
In re: Core Scientific, Inc. — Entry #17: RESPONSE of Respondent Malikie Innovations Ltd (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-08)Live source ↗
Quote: “Core "cannot hide from the fact that a significant share of the alleged infringement giving rise to this suit occurred" in the Eastern District ... "a similar share of infringing activity also occurred in the [Western District] and continues to occur there."”
How we checked this
Checked on October 13, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The brief quotes the court's local-interest findings on where the alleged infringement occurred. These include its acknowledgment that Core moved the machines out of the Eastern District.
Confirmed in the source:
- The court found that a significant share of the alleged infringement giving rise to the suit occurred in the Eastern District
- The court acknowledged that Core moved the allegedly infringing machines away from the Eastern District
- The court found that a similar share of infringing activity occurred and continues to occur in the Western District
- The finding was made in the local-interest venue analysis, not as a ruling on infringement liability
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cafc.24297/gov.uscourts.cafc.24297.17.0.pdf) in full (62,406 characters, retrieved October 8, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms In re: Core Scientific, Inc. — Entry #17: RESPONSE of Respondent Malikie Innovations Ltd
Quote: “Core "cannot hide from the fact that a significant share of the alleged infringement giving rise to this suit occurred" in the Eastern District ... "a similar share of infringing activity also occurred in the [Western District] and continues to occur there."”