Kieren Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC — Entry #30: MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D
Case: Kieren Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC cacd · 2:24-cv-09629
filed November 07, 2024
What this document is
Docket entry #30 · filed May 13, 2025
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 by May 7, 2025 29 . TheCourt noted that "[f]ailure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action." Having received no response from Plaintiff to the Court's Order, Plaintiff's individual claims are DISMISSED, and his class allegations are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) (Entered: 05/13/2025)
Who is involved
- BB OpCo, LLC
- Kieren Kishnani
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
….............. 8 6 Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., 7 962 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (N.D. Cal. 2013)…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 09, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,857 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 2:24-cv-09629-ODW-JC Document 30 Filed 05/13/25 Page 1 of 1 Page ID
#:290
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:24-cv-09629-ODW (JCx) Date May 13, 2025
Title Kieren Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC et al.
Present: The Honorable Otis D. Wright II, United States District Judge
Sheila English Not reported N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not present Not present
Proceedings (In Chambers):
In light of Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a dismissal
that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 by May 7, 2025. (ECF No. 29.) The
Court noted that “[f]ailure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this
action.” Having received no response from Plaintiff to the Court’s Order, Plaintiff’s individual
claims are DISMISSED, and his class allegations are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk
of the Court shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
: 00
Initials of Preparer SE
CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1