Kieren Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC
cacd · 2:24-cv-09629
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
….............. 8 6 Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., 7 962 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (N.D. Cal. 2013)…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Does | Defendant | |
| BB OpCo, LLC | Defendant | , , |
| Kieren Kishnani | Plaintiff | , , |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=69352813&page_size=40
#26 · 2025-03-11
The hearing on the MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint 21, scheduled for March 17, 2025 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 03/11/2025)
#22 · 2025-01-31
COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED, the MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint 21 set for March 17, 2025, will be HEARD at 1:30pm.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/31/2025)
#18 · 2025-01-13
COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED, THE MOTION TO DISMISS 17 SET for February 10, 2025 WILL BE HEARD AT 1:30PM.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/13/2025)
#30 · 2025-05-13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 by May 7, 2025 29 . TheCourt noted that "[f]ailure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action." Having received no response from Plaintiff to the Court's Order, Plaintiff's individual claims are DISMISSED, and his class allegations are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) (Entered: 05/13/20 Read the filing
#29 · 2025-04-07
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement 27, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed on inactive status. By May 7, 2025, the parties shall file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot 21 . (lc) (Entered: 04/08/2025) Read the filing
#- · 2025-04-08
(no description on the docket)
#28 · 2025-04-07
STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report filed by Defendant BB OpCo, LLC. (Tagvoryan, Ana) (Entered: 04/07/2025)
#27 · 2025-04-07
NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Kieren Kishnani. (Tauler, Robert) (Entered: 04/07/2025) Read the filing
#- · 2025-03-11
(no description on the docket)
#25 · 2025-03-03
REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint 21 filed by Defendant BB OpCo, LLC. (Tagvoryan, Anahit) (Entered: 03/03/2025) Read the filing
#24 · 2025-02-25
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint 21 filed by Plaintiff Kieren Kishnani. (Kumar, Narain) (Entered: 02/25/2025)
#23 · 2025-02-03
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE SCHEDULING ORDER on April 14, 2025. by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc) Modified on 2/3/2025 (lc). (Entered: 02/03/2025)
#- · 2025-01-31
(no description on the docket)
#21 · 2025-01-30
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by defendant BB OpCo, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 3/17/2025 at 09:30 AM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: # 1 Request for Judicial Notice, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Proposed Order) (Tagvoryan, Anahit) (Entered: 01/30/2025)
#20 · 2025-01-17
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT 17 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On January 16, 2025, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) allows plaintiffs to file an amended complaint once as a matter of course within twenty-one days of service of a Rule 12(b) motion. Therefore, Plaintiff's amended complaint was proper. As the pending motion to dismiss was based on a complaint that is no longer operative, the motion is DENIED as MOOT. (lc) (Entered: 01/17/2025)
#19 · 2025-01-16
First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1, filed by Plaintiff Kieren Kishnani(Tauler, Robert) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
#- · 2025-01-13
(no description on the docket)
#17 · 2025-01-10
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant BB OpCo, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 2/10/2025 at 09:30 AM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: # 1 Request for Judicial Notice, # 2 Exhibit A in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, # 3 Exhibit B in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, # 4 Exhibit C in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, # 5 Exhibit D in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, # 6 Exhibit E in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, # 7 Exhibit F in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, # 8 Proposed Order) (Tagvoryan, Anahi
#16 · 2024-12-26
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT BB OPCO LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO JANUARY 10, 2025 15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc) (Entered: 12/26/2024)
#15 · 2024-12-23
Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to BB OpCo, LLC answer now due 1/10/2025, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Defendant BB OpCo, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Victor J. Sandoval in Support of Joint Stipulation to Extend Time For Defendant BB OPCO LLC to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, # 2 Proposed Order)(Sandoval, Victor) (Entered: 12/23/2024)