Graham Webb International, Inc. v. C.B. <mark>Sullivan Company</mark>, Inc — Entry #26: CLERK'S JUDGMENT.IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of C.B
Case: Graham Webb International, Inc. v. C.B. <mark>Sullivan Company</mark>, Inc casd · 3:09-cv-01822
filed August 21, 2009
What this document is
Docket entry #26 · filed October 08, 2009
CLERK'S JUDGMENT.IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc against Graham Webb International, Inc.. Court denies Dft C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdictio n, under the first-to-file rule and based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Court grants Dft's motion to dismiss this action under the Federal Arbitration Act. Pla's motion for preliminary injunction is denied as moot. Case is closed subject to reopening following completion of the arbitration. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (kaj).
Who is involved
- C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc [tracked: Marathon Digital]
- Graham Webb International, Inc.
Why we have it
We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Marathon Digital (listed as “C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc”). We checked the full party list on September 29, 2026 and confirmed the match.
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 06, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,295 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.
Full text
AO 450 Judgment in a Civil Case F-| ! = D . * e United States District Curt oc °s 2% SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHER ZET* ICT OF CALIFORNIA 3Y DEPUTY Graham Webb International, Inc. V. JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE C. B. Sullivan Company, Inc. CASE NUMBER: 09cv1822-IEG(RBB) Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. [x] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court DENIES Defendant C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, under the first-to-file rule and based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss this action under the Federal Arbitration Act. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED AS MOOT. Case is closed subject to reopening following completion of THe APDITTALION ........ccccccesesceeeseeeceseeceeeeeneeerensnenersaensnsaeansaneensnenentraeenereeeaeesensgeeegeeeeeeeegees October 8, 2009 W. Samuel Harnrick, Jr. Date Clerk J. Haslam -\ , (By) Deputy Clerk ~~ | ENTERED ON October 8, 2009 09cv1822-IEG(RBB)