Graham Webb International, Inc. v. C.B. <mark>Sullivan Company</mark>, Inc
casd · 3:09-cv-01822
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Marathon Digital (listed as “C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc”). We checked the full party list on September 29, 2026 and confirmed the match.
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Graham Webb International, Inc. | party | |
| C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc [tracked: Marathon Digital] | party |
Docket entries showing 2 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=5991863&page_size=40
#26 · 2009-10-08
CLERK'S JUDGMENT.IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc against Graham Webb International, Inc.. Court denies Dft C.B. Sullivan Company, Inc's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdictio n, under the first-to-file rule and based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Court grants Dft's motion to dismiss this action under the Federal Arbitration Act. Pla's motion for preliminary injunction is denied as moot. Case is closed subject to reopening following completion of the arbitration. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) Read the filing
#25 · 2009-10-08
ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 13 Motion to Dismiss. Court denies Dft's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, under the first-t o-file rule, and based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Court grants Dft's motion to dismiss this action under the Federal Arbitration Act. Pursuant to the parties' Assignment Agreement, the question of whether Dft can include in it s pending arbitration proceeding before AAA in Minnesota its claims against Pla, arising out of the 2004 Kaleidoscope Agree Read the filing