jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved October 30, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Wexner v. Wollmuth, Maher & Deutch LLP — Entry #34: ORDER terminating 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

Case: Wexner v. Wollmuth, Maher & Deutch LLP nysd · 1:24-cv-06598

filed August 30, 2024

What this document is

Docket entry #34 · filed October 17, 2025

ORDER terminating 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the reasons stated on the record at the October 14, 2025 conference, Defendants motion to dismiss, ECF No. 25, is granted. Plaintiffs shall file any amended complaint by Nove mber 14, 2025. Any amended complaint shall address the deficiencies identified in the Courts October 14, 2025 ruling. In accordance with Rule 1.D of the Courts Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, any amended complaint should be filed wit h a redline showing all differences between the original and revised filing. Plaintiffs will not be given any further opportunity to amend the complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss absent good cause. If Plaintiffs amend, then by three weeks after the amended complaint is filed, Defendants shall file an answer or a new motion to dismiss. If Defendants file a new motion to dismiss, any opposition shall be filed within 14 days, and any reply shall be filed within seven d ays of any opposition. If no amended complaint is filed by November 14, 2025, then without further order of this Court, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment indicating that this action is dismissed without prejudice, in accordance with the Court's October 14, 2025 ruling. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate ECF No. 25. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 10/17/2025) (jca)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 30, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.627593/gov.uscourts.nysd.627593.34.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2025-12-13 00:00:00-05:00
Retrieved
2026-10-30 06:48:29.863179-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
163964
SHA-256
64bc66d098a7bc80cfa1df420885571bc2a4380312f465878d5c31ea61e05eac

Document text

2 page(s), 2,171 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:24-cv-06598-LTS           Document 34       Filed 10/17/25      Page 1 of 2


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

 HARRISON K. WEXNER et al.,
                                Plaintiffs,
                                                          24 Cv. 06598 (JHR)
                        -v.-
                                                          ORDER
 WOLLMUTH MAHER & DEUTSCH LLP et
 al.,
                                Defendants.

JENNIFER H. REARDEN, District Judge:

       For the reasons stated on the record at the October 14, 2025 conference, Defendants’

motion to dismiss, ECF No. 25, is granted. Plaintiffs shall file any amended complaint by

November 14, 2025. Any amended complaint shall address the deficiencies identified in the

Court’s October 14, 2025 ruling.

       In accordance with Rule 1.D of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases,

any amended complaint should be filed with a redline showing all differences between the

original and revised filing. Plaintiffs will not be given any further opportunity to amend the

complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss absent good cause.

       If Plaintiffs amend, then by three weeks after the amended complaint is filed, Defendants

shall file an answer or a new motion to dismiss. If Defendants file a new motion to dismiss, any

opposition shall be filed within 14 days, and any reply shall be filed within seven days of any

opposition.

       If no amended complaint is filed by November 14, 2025, then without further order of

this Court, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment indicating that this action is dismissed

without prejudice, in accordance with the Court’s October 14, 2025 ruling.

       The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate ECF No. 25.


      Case 1:24-cv-06598-LTS   Document 34   Filed 10/17/25    Page 2 of 2


      SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2025
       New York, New York


                                                  JENNIFER H. REARDEN
                                                  United States District Judge


                                     2