Wexner v. Wollmuth, Maher & Deutch LLP
nysd · 1:24-cv-06598
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CoreWeave: its name “CoreWeave” appears in a filing in this case.
…Hersch’s benefit. K. The FF Fund’s CoreWeave Interest. 63. Also relevant to the…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Wexner | party | |
| Wollmuth, Maher & Deutch LLP | party |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=69120700&page_size=40
#38 · 2026-01-13
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 37 Order,, 34 Order. in favor of Wollmuth, Maher & Deutch LLP, Brad J. Axelrod against David K Wexner, Hannah K Wexner, Harrison K Wexner, Sarah K Wexner. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the re asons stated in the Court's Order dated January 9, 2026 and Order dated October 17, 2025, Defendants motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiffs failed to file an amended complaint by November 14, 2025, judgment is entered dismissing this action without prejudice. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 1/13/2026) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right Read the filing
#37 · 2026-01-09
ORDER: On October 17, 2025, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss. (Docket entry no. 34.) Because Plaintiffs failed to file an amended complaint by November 14, 2025, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment dismissing this action without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/9/2026) (vfr) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. Read the filing
#36 · 2025-11-05
(no description on the docket)
#35 · 2025-11-05
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-11-05
(no description on the docket)
#34 · 2025-10-17
ORDER terminating 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the reasons stated on the record at the October 14, 2025 conference, Defendants motion to dismiss, ECF No. 25, is granted. Plaintiffs shall file any amended complaint by Nove mber 14, 2025. Any amended complaint shall address the deficiencies identified in the Courts October 14, 2025 ruling. In accordance with Rule 1.D of the Courts Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, any amended complaint should be filed wit h a redline showing all differences between the original and revised filing. Plaintiffs will not b Read the filing
#- · 2025-10-17
(no description on the docket)
#33 · 2025-10-10
(no description on the docket)
#32 · 2025-09-17
(no description on the docket)
#31 · 2025-09-16
(no description on the docket)
#30 · 2025-03-04
(no description on the docket)
#29 · 2024-12-18
(no description on the docket)
#28 · 2024-12-12
(no description on the docket)
#27 · 2024-12-11
(no description on the docket)
#26 · 2024-12-09
(no description on the docket)
#25 · 2024-11-27
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-11-12
(no description on the docket)
#22 · 2024-10-29
(no description on the docket)
#23 · 2024-10-29
(no description on the docket)
#17 · 2024-10-28
(no description on the docket)