Zhongjian v. enCore Energy Corp. — Entry #60: Unopposed MOTION for Clarification as to 59 Order by Oystein Kjelsvik, filed
Case: Zhongjian v. enCore Energy Corp. txsd · 4:25-cv-01234
filed March 14, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #60 · filed April 24, 2026
Unopposed MOTION for Clarification as to 59 Order by Oystein Kjelsvik, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/15/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Kendall, Joe) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Who is involved
- Connor Voss
- Douglas Lyon
- enCore Energy Corp.
- Oystein Kjelsvik
- Paul Goranson
- Shona Wilson
- Sun Zhongjian
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its former name “FLIGHT SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES INC” appears in a filing in this case.
…Co-Lead Counsel. $1.2 million. • Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., (D. Conn.). Rosen Lead Counsel. $1…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 20, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 4,835 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 4:25-cv-01234 Document 60 Filed 04/24/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
SUN ZHONGJIAN, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, Case No. 4:25-cv-01234
v. Hon. Nicholas J. Ganjei
ENCORE ENERGY CORP., PAUL
GORANSON, and SHONA WILSON,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
Lead Plaintiff Øystein Kjelsvik (“Plaintiff”) respectfully submits this Motion for
Clarification in response to this Court’s Order dated April 22, 2026 (ECF No. 59),
regarding Plaintiff’s time to file a response in opposition to Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss (ECF No. 55).
The Court previously entered an Order ECF No. 14, later amended by ECF No. 23,
regarding certain parties which provided that Plaintiff “shall have sixty (60) days to oppose
Defendants’ motion to dismiss,” and “Defendants shall have forty-five (45) days thereafter
to file their reply in further support of the motion.” In accordance with ECF No. 14 and
ECF No. 23, Plaintiff’s time to file his opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is May
11, 2026.
1
Case 4:25-cv-01234 Document 60 Filed 04/24/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 3
The Court’s April 22, 2026 Order appears to be in conflict with ECF No. 14 and
ECF No. 23. Plaintiff seeks clarification of which Order should govern when Plaintiff’s
Opposition is to be filed.
Dated: April 24, 2026 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Joe Kendall
Joe Kendall, Attorney-in-charge
Texas Bar No. 11260700
S.D. Tex. Bar. No. 30973
KENDALL LAW GROUP, PLLC
3811 Turtle Creek, Suite 825
Dallas, Texas 75219
(214) 744-3000
[email protected]
Texas Local/Liaison Counsel for Lead
Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
Jeffrey C. Block (pro hac vice)
Jacob A. Walker (pro hac vice)
Brendan Jarboe (pro hac vice)
Sarah E. Delaney (pro hac vice)
BLOCK & LEVITON LLP
260 Franklin Street, Suite 1860
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 398-5600
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the Proposed
Class
2
Case 4:25-cv-01234 Document 60 Filed 04/24/26 in TXSD Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT
Per the Court’s Procedural Rules 16(b) and 16(c), I certify that this document has
been prepared in Times New Roman 13-point font, and, exclusive of those portions of the
document exempted, contains 151 words.
/s/ Joe Kendall
Joe Kendall
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
Pursuant to the Court’s Procedural Rule 15(a), counsel for Lead Plaintiff conferred
with counsel for Defendants concerning this Motion. Defendants do not oppose this
Motion.
/s/ Joe Kendall
Joe Kendall
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that all counsel of record have been served a true and correct copy of this
document by electronic submission for filing and service through the Electronic Case
Filing System of the Southern District of Texas on April 24, 2026.
/s/ Joe Kendall
Joe Kendall
3