Joshua Adam Kaplan — Entry #146: Stipulation By and Between CSC Capital Group, LLC and Joshua Adam Kaplan Re: Stipulation for Consent Judgment
Case: Joshua Adam Kaplan mieb · 25-48523
filed August 22, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #146 · filed September 23, 2026
Stipulation By and Between CSC Capital Group, LLC and Joshua Adam Kaplan Re: Stipulation for Consent Judgment . Filed by Creditor CSC Capital Group, LLC. (Bank, Jason) (Entered: 09/23/2026)
Who is involved
- Homer W. McClarty
- Joshua Adam Kaplan
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CoreWeave: its name “CoreWeave” appears in a filing in this case.
…<bseyburn@sslawgrp.com>;Josh Kaplan CoreWeave IPO (Symbol: 30720 32ef4fe314b1277c…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 29, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
5 page(s), 7,348 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE MATTER OF: )
) Case No. 25-48523-tjt
JOSHUA ADAM KAPLAN ) Chapter 7
) Judge Thomas J. Tucker
Debtor. )
______________________________/
CSC CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, Adv Pro No.: 25-04237-tjt
Judge Thomas J. Tucker
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOSHUA ADAM KAPLAN,
Defendant.
STIPULATION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, CSC Capital Group, LLC (“CSC”) and Defendant, Joshua Adam
Kaplan (the “Debtor”) hereby stipulate to the entry of the Consent Judgment
attached as Exhibit 1.
(signatures on next page)
25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 1 of 5
KERR, RUSSELL AND WEBER, PLC OSIPOV BIGELMAN, P.C.
By: /s/ Jason W. Bank By: /s / Jeffrey H.Bigelman
Jason W. Bank (P54447) Jeffrey H. Bigelman (P61755)
Abram G. Miller (P86289) 20700 Civic Center Drive
500 Woodward Avenue Suite 420
Suite 2500 Southfield, MI 48076
Detroit, MI 48226 (248) 663-1800
(313) 961-0200 jhb@osbig.com
jbank@kerr-russell.com
amiller@kerr-russell.com Attorneys for Defendant
Attorneys for CSC Capital Group,
LLC By: /s/ ______________
Joshua Adam Kaplan
25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 2 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 2 of 5
4937-1399-9570, v. 1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE MATTER OF: )
) Case No. 25-48523-tjt
JOSHUA ADAM KAPLAN ) Chapter 7
) Judge Thomas J. Tucker
Debtor. )
______________________________/
CSC CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, Adv Pro No.: 25-04237-tjt
Judge Thomas J. Tucker
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOSHUA ADAM KAPLAN,
Defendant.
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Before the court is the Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment (the
“Stipulation”) filed by the Plaintiff, CSC Capital Group, LLC (“CSC”) and
Defendant, Joshua Adam Kaplan (the “Debtor” or "Kaplan"). The Court has
reviewed the Stipulation, being fully apprised, and for good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
1. The Stipulation is approved.
2. Judgment is entered against the Debtor and in favor of CSC in the
amount of $500,0001.
1
Post judgment interest is waived.
25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 3 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 3 of 5
4937-1399-9570, v. 1
3. The Judgment is hereby non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §
523.
4. Except to the extent necessary to establish the actual terms of the
Consent Judgment, nothing herein will be admissible or used as evidence in any
other proceeding, whether judicial, administrative, arbitral, or otherwise, involving
Kaplan or his affiliated entities. Nothing in this Consent Judgment may be
construed as an admission or finding of fact regarding the existence, validity, basis,
or amount of any claim asserted by CSC against Kaplan in any forum by third
parties.
5. As more fully set forth in the Forbearance Agreement executed by
CSC and Kaplan, CSC shall forbear on any collection for the earlier of: (i) 18
months; from the entry of this Consent Judgment or (ii) when the combined
adjusted gross income (CAGI) of Kaplan and Danielle Kaplan, as reported on their
federal return(s) regardless of filing status, exceeds $250,000 as set forth in a
Forbearance Agreement.
6. The Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce
this Agreement and the Consent Judgment, including any dispute regarding
whether an Event of Default has occurred, or regarding the calculation of CAGI
or of any installment payment, shall be determined by the Bankruptcy Court to the
extent it will exercise jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Bankruptcy
25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 4 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 4 of 5
4937-1399-9570, v. 1
Court shall not retain exclusive jurisdiction over any actions to collect or enforce
the Judgment as provided in this Agreement, which actions may be brought in any
forum of competent jurisdiction.
25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 5 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 5 of 5
4937-1399-9570, v. 1