UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) Case No. 25-48523-tjt JOSHUA ADAM KAPLAN ) Chapter 7 ) Judge Thomas J. Tucker Debtor. ) ______________________________/ CSC CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, Adv Pro No.: 25-04237-tjt Judge Thomas J. Tucker Plaintiff, vs. JOSHUA ADAM KAPLAN, Defendant. STIPULATION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT Plaintiff, CSC Capital Group, LLC (“CSC”) and Defendant, Joshua Adam Kaplan (the “Debtor”) hereby stipulate to the entry of the Consent Judgment attached as Exhibit 1. (signatures on next page) 25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 1 of 5               KERR, RUSSELL AND WEBER, PLC OSIPOV BIGELMAN, P.C. By: /s/ Jason W. Bank By: /s / Jeffrey H.Bigelman Jason W. Bank (P54447) Jeffrey H. Bigelman (P61755) Abram G. Miller (P86289) 20700 Civic Center Drive 500 Woodward Avenue Suite 420 Suite 2500 Southfield, MI 48076 Detroit, MI 48226 (248) 663-1800 (313) 961-0200 jhb@osbig.com jbank@kerr-russell.com amiller@kerr-russell.com Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for CSC Capital Group, LLC By: /s/ ______________ Joshua Adam Kaplan 25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 2 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 2 of 5 4937-1399-9570, v. 1               UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) Case No. 25-48523-tjt JOSHUA ADAM KAPLAN ) Chapter 7 ) Judge Thomas J. Tucker Debtor. ) ______________________________/ CSC CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, Adv Pro No.: 25-04237-tjt Judge Thomas J. Tucker Plaintiff, vs. JOSHUA ADAM KAPLAN, Defendant. CONSENT JUDGMENT Before the court is the Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment (the “Stipulation”) filed by the Plaintiff, CSC Capital Group, LLC (“CSC”) and Defendant, Joshua Adam Kaplan (the “Debtor” or "Kaplan"). The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, being fully apprised, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. The Stipulation is approved. 2. Judgment is entered against the Debtor and in favor of CSC in the amount of $500,0001. 1 Post judgment interest is waived. 25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 3 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 3 of 5 4937-1399-9570, v. 1               3. The Judgment is hereby non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523. 4. Except to the extent necessary to establish the actual terms of the Consent Judgment, nothing herein will be admissible or used as evidence in any other proceeding, whether judicial, administrative, arbitral, or otherwise, involving Kaplan or his affiliated entities. Nothing in this Consent Judgment may be construed as an admission or finding of fact regarding the existence, validity, basis, or amount of any claim asserted by CSC against Kaplan in any forum by third parties. 5. As more fully set forth in the Forbearance Agreement executed by CSC and Kaplan, CSC shall forbear on any collection for the earlier of: (i) 18 months; from the entry of this Consent Judgment or (ii) when the combined adjusted gross income (CAGI) of Kaplan and Danielle Kaplan, as reported on their federal return(s) regardless of filing status, exceeds $250,000 as set forth in a Forbearance Agreement. 6. The Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce this Agreement and the Consent Judgment, including any dispute regarding whether an Event of Default has occurred, or regarding the calculation of CAGI or of any installment payment, shall be determined by the Bankruptcy Court to the extent it will exercise jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Bankruptcy 25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 4 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 4 of 5 4937-1399-9570, v. 1               Court shall not retain exclusive jurisdiction over any actions to collect or enforce the Judgment as provided in this Agreement, which actions may be brought in any forum of competent jurisdiction. 25-48523-tjt Doc 146 Filed 09/23/26 5 Entered 09/23/26 15:02:36 Page 5 of 5 4937-1399-9570, v. 1