Douglas Bray v. Rocket Lab USA, Inc. — Entry #97: MINUTES OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 82 held before Judge George H Wu
Case: Douglas Bray v. Rocket Lab USA, Inc. cacd · 2:25-cv-01733
filed February 27, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #97 · filed April 16, 2026
MINUTES OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 82 held before Judge George H Wu. The Court's Tentative Ruling on Defendants' Motion 82 was issued on April 14, 2026 96 . Oral argument is held. The Court's Tentative Ruling is adopted as the Court's Final Ruling. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice. A separate order will issue. Court Recorder: ECRO / Court Smart. (aco) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
Who is involved
- Adam Spice
- Chase Renick
- Douglas Bray
- Jerald Hayes
- Joseph L. Coates
- Millibani Binoua
- Mohamed Hassan
- Peter Beck
- Richard Slepko
- Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
- Willie Croskrey
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its former name “FLIGHT SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES INC” appears in a filing in this case.
…Co-Lead Counsel. $1.2 million. • Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., (D. Conn.). Rosen Lead Counsel. $1…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 20, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,816 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 2:25-cv-01733-GW-KES Document 97 Filed 04/16/26 Page 1 of 1 Page ID
#:2095
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No. CV 25-1733-GW-KESx Date April 16, 2026
Title Douglas Bray v. Rocket Lab USA, Inc., et al.
Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Javier Gonzalez ECRO / Court Smart
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Leanne H. Solish Peter B. Morrison
Zachary Faigen
PROCEEDINGS: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT [82]
The Court’s Tentative Ruling on Defendants’ Motion [82] was issued on April 14, 2026 [96]. Oral
argument is held. The Court’s Tentative Ruling is adopted as the Court’s Final Ruling. Defendants’
Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s case is dismissed with prejudice. A separate order will issue.
: 20
Initials of Preparer JG
CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1
