Texas Blockchain Council v. Department of Energy — Entry #23: SUPPLEMENT to [21] Response in Opposition to Motion, Exhibits 1 and 2 by Riot Platforms, Inc., Texas Blockchain Council
Case: Texas Blockchain Council v. Department of Energy txwd · 6:24-cv-00099
filed February 22, 2024
What this document is
Docket entry #23 · filed February 29, 2024
SUPPLEMENT to [21] Response in Opposition to Motion, Exhibits 1 and 2 by Riot Platforms, Inc., Texas Blockchain Council. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 2)(Siegmund, Mark)
Who is involved
- Riot Platforms, Inc. [tracked: Riot]
- Chamber of Digital Commerce
- Department of Energy
- Energy Information Administration
- Jennifer M. Granholm
- Joseph Decarolis
- Office of Management and Budget
- Shalanda Young
- Sierra Club
- Texas Blockchain Council
Why we have it
We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Riot (listed as “Riot Platforms, Inc.”). We checked the full party list on September 03, 2026 and confirmed the match.
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved September 03, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 1,984 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 6:24-cv-00099-ADA Document 23-1 Filed 02/29/24 Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT 2
Case 6:24-cv-00099-ADA Document 23-1 Filed 02/29/24 Page 2 of 3
From: Kate Huddleston
To: Mark Siegmund
Cc: Chris Davis; Joshua Smeltzer; [email protected]; [email protected]; Megan Wachspress; Sanjay Narayan
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Texas Blockchain Council v. DOE - position on amicus
Date: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 2:53:51 PM
Thanks for getting back to us so quickly, Mark, and sending the order.
Best,
Kate
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 2:42 PM Mark Siegmund <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Kate,
The Court is not holding a PI hearing and just issued an order removing the hearing. See
ECF No. 17. Additionally, this case is essentially resolved, as the Parties were ordered to file
the agreement with the Court. Therefore, we believe any brief is improper. We oppose.
Sincerely,
Mark
Mark D. Siegmund
Partner
CHERRY JOHNSON SIEGMUND JAMES, PLLC
(254)732-2242
www.cjsjlaw.com
From: Kate Huddleston <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 1:54 PM
To: Mark Siegmund <[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Megan Wachspress <[email protected]>; Sanjay Narayan
<[email protected]>
Subject: Texas Blockchain Council v. DOE - position on amicus
Case 6:24-cv-00099-ADA Document 23-1 Filed 02/29/24 Page 3 of 3
Hi all--
Sierra Club is planning to file an amicus brief in opposition to the issuance of a preliminary
injunction in Texas Blockchain Council v. DOE, 6:24-cv-00099. Could you please let us
know your position on this filing by 3:30 PM Central?
Thanks,
Kate Huddleston
--
Kate Huddleston
(she/her)
Staff Attorney
Sierra Club Environmental Law Program
Houston, TX
713.714.6384
[email protected]