Smith v. United States
txnd · 3:23-cv-02338
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its name “Applied Digital Corporation” appears in a filing in this case.
…LLC 90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al 91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | party | |
| United States | party |
Docket entries showing 8 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=67922478&page_size=40
#19 · 2026-04-14
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Movant Cordell Victor Jerome Smith filed a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1). For the reasons detailed herein, Smith's motion is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 4/14/2026) (chmb) Read the filing
#20 · 2026-04-14
(no description on the docket)
#21 · 2026-04-14
(no description on the docket)
#13 · 2024-08-23
Special Order No. 3-354: Effective August 23, 2024, the cases listed on Exhibit A to this order are transferred to Magistrate Judge Brian McKay and shall henceforth carry the suffix letters BW. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-354. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Brian W McKay on 8/23/2024) (rekc) Read the filing
#- · 2024-01-25
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2023-12-20
(no description on the docket)
#5 · 2023-12-07
(no description on the docket)
#3 · 2023-10-27
(no description on the docket)
