jain.com

Lake Hawkeye capacity potential

Company: TeraWulf - Project: Cayuga Site

Subject kind
facility capacity
Statement date
2026-04-13
Promised amount
400.0 MW
Current status
stated

The claim, verbatim

Lake Hawkeye long-term ground lease has the potential to support up to 400 MW of gross capacity, representing approximately 320 MW of contractual critical IT load

Source (primary)

TeraWulf 424B5 filed 2026-04-14 (SEC EDGAR, sec_filing)
View cached copy (2026-08-31)Live source ↗

Quote: “Lake Hawkeye ("Lake Hawkeye" or the "Cayuga Site"), a long-term ground lease in Lansing, New York which, upon completion of permitting and site development, has the potential to support up to 400 MW of gross capacity, representing approximately 320 MW of contractual critical IT load.”

How we checked this

This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.

Additional evidence

confirms TeraWulf 424B5 filed 2026-04-14

Quote: “Lake Hawkeye ("Lake Hawkeye" or the "Cayuga Site"), a long-term ground lease in Lansing, New York which, upon completion of permitting and site development, has the potential to support up to 400 MW of gross capacity, representing approximately 320 MW of contractual critical IT load.”

View cached copy (2026-08-31)Live source ↗

Record of changes

September 1, 2026 — statedlater found incorrect
Automated extraction from the cited source. Recorded automatically from the cited source when it was published, then queued for evidence review.
September 2, 2026 — withdrawnlater found incorrect
Evidence review against the cited source. The provided source document excerpt contains no mention of Lake Hawkeye, Cayuga Site, Lansing New York, or the 400 MW/320 MW capacity figures; it only discusses a Hawesville Kentucky data center site.
September 2, 2026 — stated
Correction after re-verification. Re-verification found the cited source does support this claim. The earlier withdrawal was made in error and has been reversed. The attributed quote appears verbatim in the cited source (deterministic check).