jain.com
The Analysis · Companies · People · Methodology

Microsoft GPU Services Agreement

Company: IREN - Project: Childress

Subject kind
customer
Statement date
2026-05-31
Current status
stated

The claim, verbatim

Hardware 3 has an agreement with Microsoft Corporation dated November 2, 2025 to provide dedicated GPU services in tranches at data center facilities in Childress, Texas

Source (primary)

IREN 8-K filed 2026-06-01 (SEC EDGAR, sec_filing)
View cached copy (2026-08-31)Live source ↗

Quote: “Hardware 3's agreement dated November 2, 2025 (the "Microsoft Contract") with Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") to provide dedicated GPU services in tranches at data center facilities located in Childress, Texas”

How we checked this

Attempted on September 14, 2026. We could not read enough of the cited source to check this claim.

The verification run did not return a result for this claim (claude -p exit 1: b'').

What we did: Read our cached copy of SEC EDGAR (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1878848/000114036126023427/ef20075181_8k.htm) in full (8,873 characters, retrieved August 31, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.

Additional evidence

confirms IREN 8-K filed 2026-06-01

Quote: “Hardware 3's agreement dated November 2, 2025 (the "Microsoft Contract") with Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") to provide dedicated GPU services in tranches at data center facilities located in Childress, Texas”

View cached copy (2026-08-31)Live source ↗

Record of changes

September 1, 2026 — statedlater found incorrect
Automated extraction from the cited source. Recorded automatically from the cited source when it was published, then queued for evidence review.
September 1, 2026 — withdrawnlater found incorrect
Evidence review against the cited source. The source document is an SEC Form 8-K cover page for IREN LIMITED dated May 29, 2026, containing no information about Hardware 3, Microsoft GPU agreements, or Childress, Texas data centers.
September 2, 2026 — stated
Correction after re-verification. Re-verification found the cited source does support this claim. The earlier withdrawal was made in error and has been reversed. The attributed quote appears verbatim in the cited source (deterministic check).