jain.com
The Analysis · Companies · People · Methodology

20-year lease with unnamed global technology company

Company: CleanSpark - Project: Sandersville

Subject kind
partnership
Statement date
2026-08-25
Current status
stated

The claim, verbatim

CleanSpark announced a 20-year lease with an unnamed global technology company for its Sandersville data center, with options to extend to 30 years total

Source (primary)

CleanSpark plans transition from Bitcoin mining to high-performance computing in Sandersville - AOL.com (-, news_article)
View cached copy (2026-09-01)Live source ↗

Quote: “CleanSpark recently announced a 20-year lease with an unnamed global technology company for its Sandersville data center. The initial lease runs for 20 years and includes two five-year extension options, which could extend the agreement to 30 years.”

How we checked this

This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.

Additional evidence

confirms CleanSpark plans transition from Bitcoin mining to high-performance computing in Sandersville - AOL.com

Quote: “CleanSpark recently announced a 20-year lease with an unnamed global technology company for its Sandersville data center. The initial lease runs for 20 years and includes two five-year extension options, which could extend the agreement to 30 years.”

View cached copy (2026-09-01)Live source ↗

Record of changes

September 1, 2026 — statedlater found incorrect
Automated extraction from the cited source. Recorded automatically from the cited source when it was published, then queued for evidence review.
September 2, 2026 — withdrawnlater found incorrect
Evidence review against the cited source. The source confirms the 20-year lease with the unnamed tech company, but contains no information about extension options or extending to 30 years total.
September 2, 2026 — stated
Correction after re-verification. Re-verification found the cited source does support this claim. The earlier withdrawal was made in error and has been reversed. Both sentences in the attributed quote appear verbatim in the source and fully support the claim, but they are spliced from non-adjacent paragraphs rather than being one contiguous verbatim quote.