Kishnani v. BB OpCo class action dismissed
Company: Nebius
The claim, verbatim
The court dismissed the plaintiff's individual claims and dismissed the class allegations without prejudice after the plaintiff failed to file a Rule 41 dismissal by May 7, 2025 following a notice of settlement, and ordered the case closed.
Source (primary)
Kieren Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC — Entry #30: MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-09)Live source ↗
Quote: “Plaintiff's individual claims are DISMISSED, and his class allegations are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case.”
How we checked this
Checked on November 10, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The May 13, 2025 minute order states each of these points: the plaintiff missed the May 7 deadline set after the notice of settlement, so the court dismissed the individual claims, dismissed the class allegations without prejudice, and closed the case.
Confirmed in the source:
- The plaintiff had filed a notice of settlement in Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC
- The court ordered the plaintiff to file a Rule 41 dismissal by May 7, 2025
- The plaintiff did not respond to the court's order
- The court dismissed the plaintiff's individual claims
- The court dismissed the class allegations without prejudice
- The court ordered the Clerk to close the case
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cacd.947533/gov.uscourts.cacd.947533.30.0.pdf) in full (1,135 characters, retrieved November 9, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Kieren Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC — Entry #30: MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D
Quote: “Plaintiff's individual claims are DISMISSED, and his class allegations are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case.”