Uniloc v. Broderick patent case dismissed with prejudice per settlement
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. and defendant Michael W. Broderick jointly stipulated, following a settlement, that the action and all claims that were or might have been alleged be dismissed with prejudice and on the merits, with each party bearing its own costs and fees. The filing does not mention Marathon Digital.
Source (primary)
Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. v. Michael W Broderick — Entry #78: STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg S.A (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-08)Live source ↗
Quote: “the above-entitled action, together with all claims which were or might have been alleged therein, shall be dismissed by the Court with prejudice and on the merits, with each party bearing its own costs and fees”
How we checked this
Checked on November 9, 2026. The cited source supports part of this claim, but not all of it.
The stipulation confirms a joint dismissal with prejudice and on the merits, with each side bearing its own costs and fees, and it never mentions Marathon Digital. It does not mention any settlement and does not describe the nature of the claims, so it does not show that a settlement occurred or that this was a patent case.
Confirmed in the source:
- Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. and defendant Michael W. Broderick jointly stipulated, through their attorneys, to dismissal of the action
- The stipulation covers the action and all claims that were or might have been alleged in it
- The dismissal is with prejudice and on the merits
- Each party bears its own costs and fees
- The filing does not mention Marathon Digital
We could not confirm this from the cited source:
- The stipulated dismissal followed a settlement between Uniloc and Broderick
- The case was a patent case
That does not mean it is false — only that this source does not establish it, as of the date above. If we find a source that settles it, we will re-check and update this page.
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cacd.639848/gov.uscourts.cacd.639848.78.0.pdf) in full (3,905 characters, retrieved November 8, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. v. Michael W Broderick — Entry #78: STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg S.A
Quote: “the above-entitled action, together with all claims which were or might have been alleged therein, shall be dismissed by the Court with prejudice and on the merits, with each party bearing its own costs and fees”
confirms Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. v. Michael W Broderick — Entry #78: STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg S.A
Quote: “Based on the Stipulation filed by counsel to the parties, the above-entitled matter, together with all claims which were or might have been alleged therein, shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and on the merits, with each party bearing its own costs and fees.”