Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. v. Michael W Broderick — Entry #78: STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg S.A
Case: Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. v. Michael W Broderick cacd · 8:16-cv-00231
filed February 10, 2016
What this document is
Docket entry #78 · filed April 05, 2017
STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Steven) (Entered: 04/05/2017)
Who is involved
- Margaret A Levy
- Michael W Broderick
- Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its project “Plano” appears in a filing in this case.
…Town Center I, Suite 380, 7160 Dallas Parkway, Plano, Texas 75024. 2. Broderick is a citizen…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 08, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 4,557 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 8:16-cv-00231-CJC-DFM Document 78-1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:487
1 Steven C. Smith, CA State Bar No. 116246
SMITH LC
2 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 925
Irvine, CA 92612
3 Telephone: (949) 416-5000
Facsimile: (949) 416-5555
4 Email: ssmith@smith-lc.com
5 John L. Krenn, Esq., MN State Bar No. 12493X
GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.
6 500 IDS Center
80 S. Eighth Street
7 Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: (612) 632-3222
8 Facsimile: (612) 632-4222
Email: john.krenn@gpmlaw.com
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10 Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A.
11
12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13 CENTRAL DISTRICT
14 SOUTHERN DIVISION
15
UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A., CASE NO: 8:16-cv-00231-CJC-DFM
16
Plaintiff, Assigned to: Judge Cormac J. Carney
17
Dept.: 9B
18 vs. Referred to: Magistrate Judge Douglas
F. McCormick
19 MICHAEL W. BRODERICK, Dept.: 6B
20 Defendant. Complaint Filed: 10/13/15
21 Trial Date: 08/29/17
22 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
23
24
25
26 Based on the Stipulation filed by counsel to the parties, the above-entitled
27
matter, together with all claims which were or might have been alleged therein, shall
28
1
[Proposed] Order for Dismissal With Prejudice
Case 8:16-cv-00231-CJC-DFM Document 78-1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:488
1 be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and on the merits, with each party bearing
2
its own costs and fees.
3
4 Dated: __________________ BY THE COURT:
5
6 ____________________________________
Judge of District Court
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order for Dismissal With Prejudice
Case 8:16-cv-00231-CJC-DFM Document 78-1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:489
1 PROOF OF SERVICE
Uniloc v. Broderick
2 USDC Case No. 8:16-cv-00231
3 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 years, employed in the County of
Orange, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite
4 925, Irvine, CA 92612. On April 5, 2017, I affected electronic service of the following:
5 (PROPOSED ) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
6 on all interested parties in this action listed below:
7
Brett J Vottero
8 Fein Emond and Applebaum PC
53 Mulberry Street
9 Springfield, MA 01105
413-781-5400
10 413-739-0801 (fax)
bvottero@fpepc.com
11
12 Jason N. Cirlin
Koletsky, Mancini, Feldman & Morrow
13 3460 Wilshire Boulevard, Eighth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90010
14 213-427-2350
213-427-2366 (fax)
15 jcirlin@kmfm.com
16
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is
17 true and correct.
18 Executed on April 5, 2017, in Irvine, California.
19
20 /s/ Kaylene Canaan
Kaylene Canaan
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[Proposed] Order for Dismissal With Prejudice