Alleged noise and vibration nuisance at Granbury cryptomine
Company: Marathon Digital - Project: Granbury
The claim, verbatim
Plaintiff alleges that low-frequency noise and vibrations from MARA's persistent and excessively loud operating equipment at the Hood County cryptomine constitute a nuisance.
Source (primary)
Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — Entry #37: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court determines that the Findings, Conclusions, and… (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-15)Live source ↗
Quote: “the low frequency noise and vibrations from [Defendant's] persistent and excessively loud operating equipment are the central focus of this suit.”
How we checked this
Checked on October 17, 2026. The cited source supports part of this claim, but not all of it.
The order confirms that the plaintiff brought a private nuisance suit centered on low-frequency noise and vibrations from MARA's persistent and excessively loud equipment at the MARA Cryptomine. It does not itself state where the cryptomine is located; it names Hood County only as the state court the case was sent back to.
Confirmed in the source:
- The plaintiff, Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow, alleges that low-frequency noise and vibrations from the defendant's operating equipment are the central focus of its suit.
- The plaintiff describes the defendant's operating equipment as persistent and excessively loud.
- The defendant is MARA Holdings, Inc. (formerly Marathon Digital Holdings), and the operations at issue are at the 'MARA Cryptomine.'
- The court treats the suit as a private nuisance case under Texas law, and the plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction against unreasonable noise and vibrations from the cryptomine.
We could not confirm this from the cited source:
- The court order does not state that the MARA cryptomine is located in Hood County. It says only that the case was remanded to the 335th Judicial District Court of Hood County, Texas.
That does not mean it is false — only that this source does not establish it, as of the date above. If we find a source that settles it, we will re-check and update this page.
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.395717/gov.uscourts.txnd.395717.37.0.pdf) in full (8,903 characters, retrieved October 15, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — Entry #37: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court determines that the Findings, Conclusions, and…
Quote: “the low frequency noise and vibrations from [Defendant's] persistent and excessively loud operating equipment are the central focus of this suit.”