Malikie patent dispute dismissed
Company: Core Scientific
The claim, verbatim
Core Scientific, Malikie Innovations and Key Patent Innovations notified the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas that they are dismissing their cryptography patent dispute; claims on four patents were dismissed with prejudice, while claims on two additional patents and Core Scientific's counterclaims were dismissed without prejudice.
Source (primary)
Core Scientific, Patent Owner Resolve Cryptography Tech Dispute - Bloomberg Law News (-, news_article)
View cached copy (2026-10-11)Live source ↗Archive.org ↗
Quote: “claims by the plaintiffs relating to four patents were dismissed with prejudice, while claims relating to two additional patents and counterclaims by Core Scientific were dismissed without prejudice”
How we checked this
Checked on October 15, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The Bloomberg Law article states that the three parties notified the Eastern District of Texas court that they were dismissing their cryptography patent dispute. It also gives the same with-prejudice and without-prejudice breakdown as the claim.
Confirmed in the source:
- Core Scientific, Malikie Innovations and Key Patent Innovations notified the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas that they are dismissing their dispute
- The dispute concerned patents on methods for cryptography
- Claims by the plaintiffs relating to four patents were dismissed with prejudice
- Claims relating to two additional patents were dismissed without prejudice
- Core Scientific's counterclaims were dismissed without prejudice
What we did: Read our cached copy of the publisher (https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/core-scientific-patent-owner-resolve-cryptography-tech-dispute) in full (5,433 characters, retrieved October 11, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Core Scientific, Patent Owner Resolve Cryptography Tech Dispute - Bloomberg Law News
Quote: “claims by the plaintiffs relating to four patents were dismissed with prejudice, while claims relating to two additional patents and counterclaims by Core Scientific were dismissed without prejudice”