CoreWeave objected to NAI subpoena; motion to compel filed in W.D. Tex.
Company: CoreWeave
The claim, verbatim
CoreWeave, along with the other eight subpoenaed companies, objected to NAI's subpoena. NAI then filed a motion to compel, and the motion concerning CoreWeave was among the eight filed in the Western District of Texas.
Source (primary)
Neural AI, LLC v. OAI International, Inc. — Entry #18: ORDER Re: Motion to Compel by Magistrate Judge Alex G (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-10)Live source ↗
Quote: “All nine companies objected to the subpoenas, which prompted NAI to file nine motions to compel. NAI filed eight of those motions in the Western District of Texas.”
How we checked this
Checked on October 14, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The order says all nine companies objected and NAI filed nine motions to compel. Eight were filed in Texas and only the OAI International motion was filed in California, so CoreWeave's motion was among the Texas filings.
Confirmed in the source:
- All nine subpoenaed companies, including CoreWeave, objected to NAI's subpoenas
- The objections led NAI to file nine motions to compel
- Eight of the motions were filed in the Western District of Texas
- The only motion not filed in Texas was the one against OAI International, which was filed in the Northern District of California, so the motion concerning CoreWeave was among the eight filed in Texas
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cand.476392/gov.uscourts.cand.476392.18.0.pdf) in full (2,220 characters, retrieved October 10, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Neural AI, LLC v. OAI International, Inc. — Entry #18: ORDER Re: Motion to Compel by Magistrate Judge Alex G
Quote: “All nine companies objected to the subpoenas, which prompted NAI to file nine motions to compel. NAI filed eight of those motions in the Western District of Texas.”