District court denied transfer to W.D. Tex.
Company: Core Scientific
The claim, verbatim
The district court adopted the magistrate judge's March 2026 order denying Core's motion to transfer, finding that Core failed to show the Western District of Texas is clearly more convenient.
Source (primary)
In re: Core Scientific, Inc. — Entry #17: RESPONSE of Respondent Malikie Innovations Ltd (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-08)Live source ↗
Quote: “The court therefore overruled Core's objections and adopted the magistrate judge's order ... found that Core failed to prove that the Western District "is clearly more convenient."”
How we checked this
Checked on October 13, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The brief describes the March 2026 magistrate order denying transfer. It says the district court adopted that order and found Core had not shown the Western District was clearly more convenient.
Confirmed in the source:
- A magistrate judge denied Core's transfer motion in a March 2026 order
- The district court overruled Core's objections and adopted the magistrate judge's order
- The court found that Core failed to prove the Western District of Texas is clearly more convenient
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cafc.24297/gov.uscourts.cafc.24297.17.0.pdf) in full (62,406 characters, retrieved October 8, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms In re: Core Scientific, Inc. — Entry #17: RESPONSE of Respondent Malikie Innovations Ltd
Quote: “The court therefore overruled Core's objections and adopted the magistrate judge's order ... found that Core failed to prove that the Western District "is clearly more convenient."”