King Mountain JV electricity access
Company: Hut 8 - Project: King Mountain
The claim, verbatim
King Mountain JV, in which USBTC held 50% interest, had access to approximately 280 MW of electricity
Source (primary)
Aliko v. Tai — Entry #34: AMENDED COMPLAINT Verified Consolidated Shareholder Derivative (Redacted) against Joseph Flinn, Asher Genoot, Alexia Hefti, Mike Ho, Hut 8 Corp., Jamie… (RECAP (purchased via PACER), court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-27)Live source ↗
Quote: “it held a held a 50% interest in a site in King Mountain Texas, the King Mountain JV also referred to as the "Echo Site," that had access to approximately 280 MW of electricity.”
How we checked this
Checked on October 12, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
Paragraph 39 states both facts directly.
Confirmed in the source:
- USBTC held a 50% interest in the King Mountain JV (the Echo Site)
- The King Mountain JV had access to approximately 280 MW of electricity
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (purchased via PACER) (https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.663463/gov.uscourts.flsd.663463.34.0.pdf) in full (96,045 characters, retrieved September 27, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Aliko v. Tai — Entry #34: AMENDED COMPLAINT Verified Consolidated Shareholder Derivative (Redacted) against Joseph Flinn, Asher Genoot, Alexia Hefti, Mike Ho, Hut 8 Corp., Jamie…
Quote: “it held a held a 50% interest in a site in King Mountain Texas, the King Mountain JV also referred to as the "Echo Site," that had access to approximately 280 MW of electricity.”