jain.com

Security video footage promised but not provided

Company: Riot

Subject kind
regulatory
Statement date
2026-02-18
Current status
stated

The claim, verbatim

HR repeatedly stated that security team was finishing security footage that would be provided to plaintiff, but no footage was ever provided and plaintiff alleges it may have been spoliated.

Source (primary)

Howell v. Riot Platforms Inc — Entry #1: COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Coronet Howell (RECAP (purchased via PACER), court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-26)Live source ↗

Quote: “Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's human resources department repeatedly made statement that the security team was 'finishing the footage' and would provide the video footage to Plaintiff. As of today, no footage was ever provided. On information and belief, the footage has been spoliated.”

How we checked this

Checked on September 28, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.

Paragraph 51 contains each of these allegations. The complaint states spoliation on information and belief, which is firmer than the claim's 'may have been.'

Confirmed in the source:

What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (purchased via PACER) (https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.415502/gov.uscourts.txnd.415502.1.0.pdf) in full (22,976 characters, retrieved September 26, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.

Additional evidence

confirms Howell v. Riot Platforms Inc — Entry #1: COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Coronet Howell

Quote: “Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's human resources department repeatedly made statement that the security team was 'finishing the footage' and would provide the video footage to Plaintiff. As of today, no footage was ever provided. On information and belief, the footage has been spoliated.”

View cached copy (2026-09-26)Live source ↗