Security video footage promised but not provided
Company: Riot
The claim, verbatim
HR repeatedly stated that security team was finishing security footage that would be provided to plaintiff, but no footage was ever provided and plaintiff alleges it may have been spoliated.
Source (primary)
Howell v. Riot Platforms Inc — Entry #1: COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Coronet Howell (RECAP (purchased via PACER), court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-26)Live source ↗
Quote: “Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's human resources department repeatedly made statement that the security team was 'finishing the footage' and would provide the video footage to Plaintiff. As of today, no footage was ever provided. On information and belief, the footage has been spoliated.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Howell v. Riot Platforms Inc — Entry #1: COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Coronet Howell
Quote: “Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's human resources department repeatedly made statement that the security team was 'finishing the footage' and would provide the video footage to Plaintiff. As of today, no footage was ever provided. On information and belief, the footage has been spoliated.”