Celsius Network contractual breach and automatic stay violation
Company: Core Scientific
The claim, verbatim
Celsius Network alleged that Core Scientific violated the automatic stay by refusing to perform contractual obligations, threatening to terminate the agreement, and imposing improper surcharges.
Source (primary)
Core Scientific, Inc. — Entry #1842: Adversary case 22-03345 (RECAP (purchased via PACER), court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-26)Live source ↗
Quote: “Celsius Network LLC and related entities filed a motion to enforce the automatic stay and for civil contempt in bankruptcy proceedings alleging that Core Scientific 'has knowingly and repeatedly violated the automatic stay provisions' by refusing to perform its contractual obligations, threatening to terminate the companies' agreement, and adding improper surcharges.”
How we checked this
Checked on September 28, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
Paragraph 5 of the complaint describes Celsius's September 28, 2022 motion making these allegations.
Confirmed in the source:
- Celsius Network filed a motion alleging Core Scientific violated the automatic stay
- The alleged violations included refusing to perform contractual obligations
- The alleged violations included threatening to terminate the agreement
- The alleged violations included adding improper surcharges
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (purchased via PACER) (https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txsb.460090/gov.uscourts.txsb.460090.1842.0.pdf) in full (60,424 characters, retrieved September 26, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Core Scientific, Inc. — Entry #1842: Adversary case 22-03345
Quote: “Celsius Network LLC and related entities filed a motion to enforce the automatic stay and for civil contempt in bankruptcy proceedings alleging that Core Scientific 'has knowingly and repeatedly violated the automatic stay provisions' by refusing to perform its contractual obligations, threatening to terminate the companies' agreement, and adding improper surcharges.”