King Mountain Joint Venture improperly accounted interest expenses
Company: Hut 8 - Project: King Mountain
The claim, verbatim
King Mountain Joint Venture had certain interest expenses that were not properly accounted for, making it appear more profitable to Hut 8 than it actually was.
Source (primary)
Thompson v. Leverton — Entry #8: FILING ERROR - DUPLICATE DOCKET ENTRY - COMPLAINT against Joseph Flinn, Asher Genoot, Alexia Hefti, Michael Ho, Hut 8 Corp., Jamie Leverton, Stanley O'Neal… (RECAP (purchased via PACER), court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-25)Live source ↗
Quote: “King Mountain Joint Venture had certain interest expenses that were not properly accounted for, making it appear as if King Mountain Joint Venture would be more profitable to Hut 8 than it actually was”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Thompson v. Leverton — Entry #8: FILING ERROR - DUPLICATE DOCKET ENTRY - COMPLAINT against Joseph Flinn, Asher Genoot, Alexia Hefti, Michael Ho, Hut 8 Corp., Jamie Leverton, Stanley O'Neal…
Quote: “King Mountain Joint Venture had certain interest expenses that were not properly accounted for, making it appear as if King Mountain Joint Venture would be more profitable to Hut 8 than it actually was”