Paez v. Childrens Health System of Texas — Entry #20: Designation of Experts by Childrens Health System of Texas
Case: Paez v. Childrens Health System of Texas txnd · 3:23-cv-02243
filed October 10, 2023
What this document is
Docket entry #20 · filed July 15, 2024
Designation of Experts by Childrens Health System of Texas. (Lawrence, Molly)
Who is involved
- Childrens Health System of Texas
- Paez
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its name “Applied Digital Corporation” appears in a filing in this case.
…LLC 90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al 91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 23, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
4 page(s), 8,761 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 3:23-cv-02243-E Document 20 Filed 07/15/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID 109
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
ALEXANDER PAEZ, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-2243-E
§
CHILDREN’S HEALTH SYSTEM OF §
TEXAS, §
§
Defendant. §
DEFENDANT’S DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES
Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order issued December 27, 2023 (Dkt. 10), Defendant
Children’s Health System of Texas (“Defendant”) files its Designation of Expert Witnesses, and
in support thereof shows as follows:
Designation of Expert Witnesses
Defendant identifies the following witnesses who may be called as expert witnesses at trial:
(1) Jamie Ashton
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
8117 Preston Road, Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75225
(214) 987-3800
Ms. Ashton will testify, if necessary, as to Plaintiff’s and/or Defendant’s reasonable and
necessary attorneys’ fees. Specifically, Ms. Ashton will testify in rebuttal to any testimony or
evidence Plaintiff may offer on the subject of his attorneys’ fees.
Additionally, in the event Defendant pursues an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, or expenses
in this matter, Ms. Ashton will testify concerning, among other things, the hourly rates of the
professionals working on this case; the hours expended by each such professional; the fees,
expenses, and costs that were or will be incurred by Defendant; and the customary and usual nature,
DEFENDANT’S DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES PAGE 1
Case 3:23-cv-02243-E Document 20 Filed 07/15/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID 110
reasonableness, and necessity of the fees, costs, and expenses that were or will be incurred by
Defendant in this matter, including, if applicable, the appeal of the captioned case.
The testimony of Ms. Ashton will be based on, among other things, the time and labor
required; the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved; the skill required to perform the
legal services properly; the time limitations imposed by the client or circumstances; the nature and
length of the professional relationship with the client; the experience, reputation, and ability of the
lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and all other matters relevant to an award of attorneys’
fees, costs, and expenses. The professional profile of Ms. Ashton is available on her firm’s website
at the following link: https://ogletree.com/people/jamie-brod-ashton/
(2) Bryant S. McFall
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
8117 Preston Road, Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75225
(214) 987-3800
(214) 987-3927 (Facsimile)
Mr. McFall will testify, if necessary, as to Plaintiff’s and/or Defendant’s reasonable and
necessary attorneys’ fees. Specifically, Mr. McFall will testify in rebuttal to any testimony or
evidence Plaintiff may offer on the subject of his attorneys’ fees.
Additionally, in the event Defendant pursues an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, or expenses
in this matter, Mr. McFall will testify concerning, among other things, the hourly rates of the
professionals working on this case; the hours expended by each such professional; the fees,
expenses, and costs that were or will be incurred by Defendant; and the customary and usual nature,
reasonableness, and necessity of the fees, costs, and expenses that were or will be incurred by
Defendant in this matter, including, if applicable, the appeal of the captioned case.
DEFENDANT’S DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES PAGE 2
Case 3:23-cv-02243-E Document 20 Filed 07/15/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID 111
The testimony of Mr. McFall will be based on, among other things, the time and labor
required; the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved; the skill required to perform the
legal services properly; the time limitations imposed by the client or circumstances; the nature and
length of the professional relationship with the client; the experience, reputation, and ability of the
lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and all other matters relevant to an award of attorneys’
fees, costs, and expenses. The professional profile of Mr. McFall is available on his firm’s website
at the following link: https://ogletree.com/people/bryant-s-mcfall/
Cross Designation of Expert Witness(es)
Defendant reserves the right to elicit, by cross-examination, opinion testimony from
experts designated and called by Plaintiff, if any1. Defendant expresses its intention to possibly
call, as witnesses associated with Defendant, the individuals identified or designated by Plaintiff
as experts, if any.
Rebuttal and Other Expert Witness(es)
Defendant reserves the right to call undesignated rebuttal expert witnesses whose testimony
cannot reasonably be foreseen until the presentation of Plaintiff’s claims and evidence.
Right to Withdraw Designation of Expert
Defendant reserves the right to withdraw the designation of any expert witness previously
designated as such and to re-designate the same as a consulting expert who cannot be called by
Plaintiff.
1 Per the Scheduling Order entered in this case (Dkt. 10), Plaintiff was required to file his expert
designation(s) on or before June 14, 2024. He did not do so.
DEFENDANT’S DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES PAGE 3
Case 3:23-cv-02243-E Document 20 Filed 07/15/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID 112
Right to Elicit Opinion or Lay Opinion Testimony
Defendant reserves the right to elicit any expert opinion or lay opinion testimony from any
witness, fact or expert, at the time of trial which would be truthful, beneficial to the Court to
determine material issues of fact, and would not violate any existing order of the Court or any
applicable Federal Rule of Civil Procedure.
Reservation of Additional Rights
Defendant reserves whatever additional rights it may have with regard to expert witnesses
pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the case law
construing same, and the rulings of the Court.
Respectfully submitted,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
By: /s/ Jamie Ashton
JAMIE ASHTON
Texas State Bar No. 24087211
[email protected]
MOLLY ANN LAWRENCE
Texas State Bar No. 24083365
[email protected]
8117 Preston Road, Suite 500
Dallas, Texas 75225
(214) 987-3800 (phone)
(214) 987-3927 (fax)
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on this 15th day of July, 2024, a true and correct copy of the above
was filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to
the parties’ counsel of record.
/s/ Molly Ann Lawrence
MOLLY ANN LAWRENCE
DEFENDANT’S DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES PAGE 4
