jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 12, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Hirsch v. Owen — Entry #13

Case: Hirsch v. Owen txwd · 1:19-cv-01037

filed October 23, 2019

What this document is

Docket entry #13 · filed January 10, 2020

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 12, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txwd.1064628/gov.uscourts.txwd.1064628.13.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2020-01-10 00:00:00-05:00
Retrieved
2026-11-12 06:51:03.056932-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
143099
SHA-256
ea8d4f7116b060d1989d1753700bec4ca1915e02f67c6a0ad742a68b4723cb65

Document text

1 page(s), 1,801 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:19-cv-01037-RP Document 13 Filed 01/09/20 Page 1 of 1


                             IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                       AUSTIN DIVISION

STEVEN HIRSCH,                                       §
                                                     §
                Plaintiff,                           §
                                                     §
v.                                                   §                    1:19-CV-1037-RP
                                                     §
DOUGLAS WILLIAM OWEN, OWEN                           §
MEDIA GROUP LLC, and DOES 1 through                  §
10 inclusive,                                        §
                                                     §
                                                     §
                Defendants.                          §

                                         FINAL JUDGMENT

        On January 8, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal agreeing to dismiss this case

with prejudice. (Dkt. 12). “Stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) . . . require no judicial

action or approval and are effective automatically upon filing.” Yesh Music v. Lakewood Church, 727

F.3d 356, 362 (5th Cir. 2013). As nothing remains to resolve, the Court renders final judgment

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

        IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED.

        All pending motions in this case are DISMISSED AS MOOT.

        IT IS ORDERED that each party bear its own costs.

        SIGNED on January 9, 2020.


                                               ROBERT PITMAN
                                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE