Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #16: ORDER GRANTING [15] Motion for Extension of Time to Answer
Case: Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. txwd · 6:23-cv-00344
filed May 10, 2023
What this document is
Docket entry #16 · filed July 05, 2023
ORDER GRANTING [15] Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ; U.S. Data King Mountain LLC, U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. and U.S. Mining Infrastructure Operations, LLC answer due 10/2/2023. All other deadlines in this matter are STAYED until October 2, 2023. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (lad)
Who is involved
- Lancium LLC
- U.S. Data King Mountain LLC
- U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc.
- U.S. Mining Infrastructure Operations, LLC
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its name “Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…(“MARA Order Form”), each by and between Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (“MARA”) and TZRC KM (the “MARA Lien”);…
- Hut 8: its former name “Hut 8 Mining Corp.” appears in a filing in this case.
…address activities, events or developments that Hut 8 Mining Corp. (“Hut 8”) expects or anticipates will or…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 16, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 2,165 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 6:23-cv-00344-KC Document 16 Filed 07/05/23 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
LANCIUM LLC, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § CAUSE NO. WA-23-CV-344-KC
§
U.S. DATA MINING GROUP, INC.; §
U.S. MINING INFRASTRUCTURE §
OPERATIONS, LLC; and U.S. DATA §
KING MOUNTAIN LLC, §
§
Defendants. §
ORDER
On this day, the Court considered the parties’ Joint Motion for Extension of Time for
Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and Stay of All Other Deadlines (“Motion”),
ECF No. 15. Plaintiff filed its Complaint, ECF No. 1, on May 10, 2023. And on May 31, the
Court granted Defendants’ request to extend their deadline to respond to the Complaint until July
3. See Text Order. To facilitate ongoing settlement discussions, the parties now request that the
response deadline be extended until October 2, and that all other deadlines in the case be stayed
until October 2 as well. Mot. 2.
Upon due consideration, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendants’ deadline to respond to
Plaintiff’s Complaint is EXTENDED to October 2, 2023.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other deadlines in this matter are STAYED until
October 2, 2023.
Barring exceptional circumstances, no further extensions of Defendants’ response
deadline will be granted.
Case 6:23-cv-00344-KC Document 16 Filed 07/05/23 Page 2 of 2
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 5th day of July, 2023.
KATHLEEN CARDONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2