jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved September 28, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Cole v. Iconix International Inc. — Entry #36

Case: Cole v. Iconix International Inc. nysd · 1:25-cv-09357

filed November 10, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #36 · filed May 11, 2026

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved September 28, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.652794/gov.uscourts.nysd.652794.36.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Retrieved
2026-09-28 05:58:06.262553-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
112994
SHA-256
c13c0896f65002d12b5f8c6d11d89982418c2b213e64a7fab33f95d1995fbcb1

Document text

2 page(s), 2,104 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:25-cv-09357-MKV          Document 36        Filed 05/11/26     Page 1 of 2


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------x
                                    :
                                    : Index No. 1:25-cv-09357-MKV
 NEIL COLE,                         :
                                    :
                   Plaintiff,       :
v.                                  :
                                    :
ICONIX INTERNATIONAL INC. f/k/a/    :
ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC., and       :
SETH HOROWITZ,                      :
                                    :
                   Defendants.      :
                                    :
                                    :
------------------------------------X


                       SECOND AFFIRMATION OF DAVID R. LURIE


    DAVID R. LURIE, an attorney duly admitted to practice before this Court, does hereby state

the following under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746:

               1.     I am counsel to Seth Horowitz, a defendant in the above-captioned

Action.1

               2.     I submit this Affirmation in support of Horowitz’s Motion to Dismiss the

Amended Complaint herein, as against himself, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6).


1
 Unless otherwise indicated, initially capitalized terms employed herein are intended to have the
definitions set forth in the Memorandum of Law in Support of Horowitz’s Motion to Dismiss
and the Affirmation of David R. Lurie, herein, each dated March 27, 2026.


       Case 1:25-cv-09357-MKV             Document 36        Filed 05/11/26   Page 2 of 2


               3.      Annexed hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from

the transcript of the first trial held in the Cole Criminal Case.

Dated: May 11, 2026
Brooklyn, New York


                                                    _______________/s/_____________
                                                              David R. Lurie


                                                   2