Monther v. Lough — Entry #14: Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss [Stipulated Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Action Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1 and 41] filed by Defendants…
Case: Monther v. Lough utd · 2:18-cv-00791
filed October 10, 2018
What this document is
Docket entry #14 · filed January 27, 2021
Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss [Stipulated Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Action Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1 and 41] filed by Defendants Michael Beeghley, Willie C. Bogan, Jeff Dyer, Steven Gorlin, Denver Lough, Jon Mogford, Polarityte, John Stetson, Edward Swanson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Text of Proposed Order)(Menssen, Michael) (Entered: 01/27/2021)
Who is involved
- Denver Lough
- Edward Swanson
- Henry Monther
- Jeff Dyer
- John Stetson
- Jon Mogford
- Michael Beeghley
- Polarityte
- Steven Gorlin
- Willie C. Bogan
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its former name “Marathon Patent Group, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Chief Financial Officer, and Director of Marathon Patent Group, Inc. (MARA), a NASDAQ listed patent…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 08, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 4,749 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 2:18-cv-00791-TC Document 14 Filed 01/27/21 PageID.87 Page 1 of 3
Kenneth B. Black (05588)
ken.black@stoel.com
Michael R. Menssen (15424)
michael.menssen@stoel.com
STOEL RIVES LLP
201 S. Main Street, Suite 1100
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Telephone: (801) 328-3131
Attorneys for Defendants PolarityTE, Inc.,
Denver Lough, Michael Beeghley, Willie C.
Bogan, Jeff Dyer, Steven Gorlin, Jon Mogford,
John Stetson and Edward Swanson
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH
HENRY MONTHER, derivatively on behalf STIPULATED MOTION FOR
of POLARITYTE, INC., VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF
Plaintiff, CIVIL PROCEDURE 23.1 AND 41
v.
Case No. 2:18-cv-00791-TC
DENVER LOUGH, MICHAEL
BEEGHLEY, WILLIE C. BOGAN, JEFF Hon. Tena Campbell
DYER, STEVEN GORLIN, JON
MOGFORD, JOHN STETSON, and
EDWARD SWANSON,
Defendants,
and
POLARITYTE, INC.,
Nominal Defendant.
Case 2:18-cv-00791-TC Document 14 Filed 01/27/21 PageID.88 Page 2 of 3
Plaintiff Henry Monther (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of PolarityTE, Inc. (“Polarity”
or “Nominal Defendant”), and defendants Denver Lough, Michael Beeghley, Willie C. Bogan,
Jeff Dyer, Steven Gorlin, Jon Mogford, John Stetson, and Edward Swanson (collectively, the
“Individual Defendants,” and together with Nominal Defendant, “Defendants”) have conferred,
through their counsel, and agree that Plaintiff shall voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned
consolidated action (the “Action”) pursuant to Rules 23.1(c) and 41(a) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, without prejudice as to Plaintiff, Nominal Defendant, and/or any other Polarity
stockholder.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants (the “Parties”) agree that the dismissal is not, and
shall not be deemed to be, an adjudication of the Action on the merits, and that each Party shall
bear its own fees, costs, and expenses incurred in connection with the Action; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree and respectfully submit that additional notice to Polarity
stockholders of this dismissal beyond the public filing of the Order is unnecessary because: (i) the
dismissal is without prejudice to the ability of any Polarity stockholder, or Polarity itself, to pursue
the claims asserted in the Action; and (ii) there has been no settlement or compromise of the
Action.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the
Parties, through their undersigned counsel of record and subject to approval of the Court, that:
1. This Action shall be dismissed on the terms provided for in this Stipulation and
[Proposed] Order, without prejudice as to Plaintiff, Polarity, and/or any other Polarity stockholder.
2. Notice to Polarity stockholders of this dismissal is unnecessary because (i) the
dismissal is without prejudice to the ability of any Polarity stockholder, or Polarity itself, to pursue
2
Case 2:18-cv-00791-TC Document 14 Filed 01/27/21 PageID.89 Page 3 of 3
the claims asserted in the Action; and (ii) there has been no settlement or compromise of the
Action.
3. The Parties shall bear their own fees, costs, and expenses in connection with the
Action.
A proposed order is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 27, 2021 STOEL RIVES LLP
By /s/ Michael R. Menssen
Kenneth B. Black
Michael R. Menssen
Attorneys for Defendants POLARITYTE, INC,
DENVER LOUGH, MICHAEL BEEGHLEY,
WILLIE C. BOGAN, JEFF DYER, STEVEN
GORLIN, JON MOGFORD, JOHN STETSON,
and EDWARD SWANSON
Dated: January 27, 2021 JAMES DODGE RUSSELL & STEPHENS, PC
By /s/ Mark F. James (with permission)
Mark F. James
Attorneys for Plaintiff
3