jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 07, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE — Entry #36: Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [33] MOTION for Summary Judgment by MARIALICE BATHRUS WILLIAMS

Case: WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE dcd · 1:05-cv-01483

filed July 28, 2005

What this document is

Docket entry #36 · filed October 04, 2007

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [33] MOTION for Summary Judgment by MARIALICE BATHRUS WILLIAMS (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Beasley, Michael)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 07, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.116226/gov.uscourts.dcd.116226.36.1.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2007-10-04 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-11-07 06:50:57.646126-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
13093
SHA-256
b4ddeefd8bf184b2e9ea4952107ae4e9ba961a737b6e47b3d31f31822087218b

Document text

2 page(s), 2,157 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB          Document 36-2         Filed 10/04/2007      Page 1 of 2


                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


                                                     )
MARIALICE BATHRUS WILLIAMS,                          )
                                                     )
               Plaintiff,                            )
                                                     )
v.                                                   ) Civil Action No. 05-cv-1483
                                                     )             (JDB)
FANNIE MAE, et al.,                                  )
                                                     )
               Defendants.                           )
                                                     )


                                         ORDER

       This matter came before the Court on the unopposed motion of Plaintiff Williams

for a further extension of time to file her Opposition to the Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment in this proceeding. Based upon the reasons set forth in the motion,

the Defendants’ non-opposition, and the full record of this proceeding, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED.

       It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Opposition to the

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on or prior to October 12, 2007. Any Reply

by Defendants to Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be filed on or prior to November 2, 2007.


                                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


 Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB        Document 36-2   Filed 10/04/2007   Page 2 of 2


Serve:

Michael W. Beasley, Esq.
200 Park Avenue
Suite 106
Falls Church, Virginia 22046

Brian J. H. Lederer, Esq.
3003 Van Ness Street, N. W.
Suite W228
Washington, D. C. 20008

Sarah Alexander Goldfrank, Esq.
Evelyn L. Becker, Esq.
Kyra Anne Grundeman, Esq.
O’Melveny & Myers, LLP
1625 I Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20006

Jonathan Lee Griffith, Esq.
Fannie Mae
3900 Wisconsin Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20016


                                       2